W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

Re: What is missing for building "real" services?

From: Victor Pascual <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:29:56 +0100
Message-Id: <F26F89BA-4AE4-4D2D-89C1-32D149B01761@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Firewall/http-middlebox traversal -- we're experiencing issues in many enterprise deployments

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 22, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:

> * stable multi-stream support (this is mostly for firefox and the android version of Chrome)
> * support in IE, iOS and Safari
> 
> are the main issues that we've been seeing as adoption blockers.
> 
> --sent from my mobile
> 
> On 22 Dec 2013 08:52, "Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK" <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> During the telechat last Thursday some persons said that WebRTC is
> sufficient to do demos, but not sufficient for building a "real" service
> on top of.
> 
> I would really like to know more. If you can't build a service on top
> off WebRTC I think we have failed. Would anyone care to expand a bit on
> what is missing/wrongly designed? And explain the context/use-case.
> 
> Stefan (speaking for himself only)
> 
Received on Tuesday, 24 December 2013 09:30:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC