W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Material (again!) for scoping discussion

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:07:40 +0000
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
CC: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5E1FAFCD-7860-47BC-85A9-4A5672DC8F15@cisco.com>

On Dec 19, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>

> As a worked example of this, let's start by considering track
> rejection and hold. If I am on a low bandwidth link and someone offers
> me video, I need to be able to reject it; it's not enough to just not
> display the video, since it's still chewing up bandwidth.  So, this
> seems like a fairly critical feature for a minimally functional
> system, and yet the chair's proposal is to defer past 1.0. How
> can this work?

Even worse, the WG has consensus to use 3264 Offer / Answer and this would not be that. So this just moves us backwards and proposes opening up stuff we have had finished for a long time. 
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 16:08:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC