W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

Re: No way to specify remote constraints?

From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:06:03 -0500
Message-ID: <529D125B.7080108@bbs.darktech.org>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 02/12/2013 6:01 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> On 3 Dec 2013 09:16, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com 
> <mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 2 December 2013 13:58, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com 
> <mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > No, I think that causes a new round of SDP to be exchanged. So, you're
> > > fine with this.
> >
> > Only if your application slavishly does everything the browser tells 
> it to.
> If you use .enabled in Chrome > 30 in my experience it renegotiates 
> over SDP with the other end to mute audio on the sending side. That's 
> just my app doing what the spec says and the browser supporting what 
> the spec says IIUC.
> Silvia.
Hi Silvia,

Okay, but then the next question is: does WebRTC fire an event when the 
stream is modified (in this case, getting muted)? I want to overlay an 
image on top of the remote video when it gets muted. I need some way of 
finding out when the muting occurs. This sounds vaguely related to the 
"renegotiated" event but I don't think it gets fired.

Also, you muted audio. It remains to be seen whether this is implemented 
for video as well (though I don't see a reason for them to implement one 
without the other).

Received on Monday, 2 December 2013 23:06:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC