W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

Re: No way to specify remote constraints?

From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:38:25 -0500
Message-ID: <529CEFC1.90309@bbs.darktech.org>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Hi Martin,

Apologies, but I think we are misunderstanding each other. Just to be 
100% clear, I am trying to do this:

"Sender" sends "Receiver" video at 1080p
"Receiver" only needs 640x480, so I want "Receiver" to execute some code 
on its side that will tell "Sender" to stop sending 1080p and instead 
send 640x480 over the wire.
The goal is to reduce bandwidth usage.

I suspect the following answers no longer make sense in light of the 
above problem definition.

On 02/12/2013 2:23 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 2 December 2013 11:19, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
>> Why do I need to clone() the video track before modifying it?
> I assumed that you might want to keep the old one.

Why would I want Sender to send me the same stream twice? If I really 
wanted to display the same video using two different resolutions, I'd 
send the video once over the wire and scale it on Receiver's end.

>> What is the relationship between a cloned VideoTrack and the original
>> MediaStream?
> No relationship.  The new track is a little orphan.  You'll need a new
> stream to house this track if you want to use it though.

<confused> How could Receiver create a new stream and associate the 
track with it? Don't I need this track to be connected to Sender somehow?

Received on Monday, 2 December 2013 20:38:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC