Re: [Bug 20816] "Hold" unspecified

2013/4/19 Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>:
> 3) optionally renegotiating as sendonly, but for Hold this is generally a
> Bad Idea, as it mean un-hold requires renegotiation, which is not expected
> by most people

Why/where is that not expected? any SIP device expects that and reacts on that.

BTW sending "a=sendonly" is useful for a PBX that puts on hold a
remote phone and sends "music on hold" during the hold status. A phone
instead usually sends "a=inactive" when putting on hold a remote peer.


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>