W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2013

RE: New version of Peer Connection draft

From: Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:16:43 +0000
To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48416265F21@TK5EX14MBXC273.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Håkansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 12:20 AM
> To: public-webrtc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: New version of Peer Connection draft
> On 4/12/13 12:49 AM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) wrote:
> > So I opened a whole bunch of bugs in the bug tracker back in January,
> > and I was hoping that the next draft update would address some of
> > them. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that such has happened.
> Matthew, under the current division of responsibilities between the W3C
> and the IETF, the responsibility for specifying the majority of the things you
> filed bugs for on Jan 29th lies with the IETF. (Stream multiplexing over a single
> transport flow, RTP usage, SDP, data channel protocol, ...)

Ultimately it is the responsibility of the W3C to provide (or not provide) a specification that can be used to produce a browser that implements the specification and JavaScript code that uses it. Right now, no such specification exists.
> So I don't think we should specc that up in this document, but I agree to that
> in many cases the references are missing.

Not only are references missing but, as I point out in several of the bugs, the references provided are wholly inadequate if one wanted to, for instance, write a web browser that implemented the specification.

Matthew Kaufman
Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 20:17:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:42 UTC