- From: Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:16:43 +0000
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Håkansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 12:20 AM > To: public-webrtc@w3.org > Subject: Re: New version of Peer Connection draft > > On 4/12/13 12:49 AM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) wrote: > > So I opened a whole bunch of bugs in the bug tracker back in January, > > and I was hoping that the next draft update would address some of > > them. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that such has happened. > > Matthew, under the current division of responsibilities between the W3C > and the IETF, the responsibility for specifying the majority of the things you > filed bugs for on Jan 29th lies with the IETF. (Stream multiplexing over a single > transport flow, RTP usage, SDP, data channel protocol, ...) Ultimately it is the responsibility of the W3C to provide (or not provide) a specification that can be used to produce a browser that implements the specification and JavaScript code that uses it. Right now, no such specification exists. > So I don't think we should specc that up in this document, but I agree to that > in many cases the references are missing. Not only are references missing but, as I point out in several of the bugs, the references provided are wholly inadequate if one wanted to, for instance, write a web browser that implemented the specification. Matthew Kaufman
Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 20:17:45 UTC