- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:48:13 +0200
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <516694ED.2060501@alvestrand.no>
On 04/11/2013 06:09 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 10 April 2013 18:48, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: >> I don't like users staring at a "frozen" image for five seconds. If I >> had a way of finding out when the last video frame was received, I would >> fade out the video immediate after it begins hanging and fade it back in >> when it reconnects. What do you think? > I think that you need to work on a precise definition of "begins > hanging" such that it could be detected. You might also find that a > fadeout over such a short lapse is more annoying to your users than > you think. There may be a way of getting the time of the last > rendered update, but keep in mind that the time for the video will > probably be based on the sender clock, which can drift in relation to > the local clock. You really don't want false positives. > The spec says that the time of the <video> tag advances during playback. (See http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.html#mediastreams-as-media-elements - item about "currentTime"). Does it advance when the video freezes?
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2013 10:48:48 UTC