Re: DataChannels API and external negotiation

Ok, thanks for the clarification.

2013/4/1 Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>:
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:15 AM, piranna@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> /* If either maxRetransmitTime or maxRetransmitNum are set, it's
>>>   unreliable, else it's a reliable channel.  If both are set it's an
>>>   error.
>>
>> I don't think so (except if it's a limitation of SCTP that I didn't
>> know, so this message is useless). I think it would make sense to be
>> able to set both maxRetransmitTime and maxRetransmitNum at the same
>> time, only that since they are maximus limits it would be effective
>> the first to be reached.
> SCTP allows setting a single PR-SCTP policy packet. Supported ones are
> limiting the number of retransmissions and time to live. Not a combination
> of both. That is why you are only providing a single PR-SCTP value.
>
> If you want to limit both, you need to define a new PR-SCTP policy. That
> policy would also require two parameters (the number of retransmissions and
> the time to live in ms) as parameters, not only one as we have currently.
>
> So without defining a new PR-SCTP policy, the above text is correct.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un
>> monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo
>> Unix."
>> – Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
>>
>>
>



-- 
"Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un
monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo
Unix."
– Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux

Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 09:46:36 UTC