public-webrtc@w3.org from September 2012 by date

Friday, 28 September 2012

• Re: Event handlers in RTCPeerConnection Martin Thomson
• Re: Generalizing the stats hierarchy Martin Thomson
• Re: Generalizing the stats hierarchy Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Event handlers in RTCPeerConnection Adam Bergkvist

Thursday, 27 September 2012

• Re: Generalizing the stats hierarchy Martin Thomson
• Re: Generalizing the stats hierarchy Harald Alvestrand

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

• Re: Event handlers in RTCPeerConnection Martin Thomson
• Re: Event handlers in RTCPeerConnection Randell Jesup
• Event handlers in RTCPeerConnection Martin Thomson
• Re: Some comments//Re: New version of editor draft for webrtc Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: Re: Some comments//Re: New version of editor draft for webrtc Wangyahui
• Re: Re: Some comments//Re: New version of editor draft for webrtc Wangyahui
• Re: Opus implementation sajeesh sidharthan
• Re: [SPAM] Generalizing the stats hierarchy Tim Panton

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

• Re: Generalizing the stats hierarchy Martin Thomson
• Re: Generalizing the stats hierarchy Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Generalizing the stats hierarchy Martin Thomson
• Re: Generalizing the stats hierarchy Harald Alvestrand

Monday, 24 September 2012

• RE: Generalizing the stats hierarchy Matthew Kaufman

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

• Actions on open issues (Re: Sorting possible technical issues into categories) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Agenda for September 25 Call Eric Rescorla
• Re: Agenda for September 25 Call Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: 答复: Some comments//Re: New version of editor draft for webrtc Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: 答复: Some comments//Re: New version of editor draft for webrtc Harald Alvestrand
• 答复: Some comments//Re: New version of editor draft for webrtc Wangyahui
• Re: Agenda for September 25 Call Stefan Hakansson LK
• Agenda for September 25 Call Eric Rescorla

Monday, 24 September 2012

• Re: Opus implementation Ralph Giles
• Re: Opus implementation Alexey Aylarov
• Re: Opus implementation Ralph Giles
• Opus implementation Alexey Aylarov
• RE: What's the differences between webrtc and Adobe's Cirrus? Li, Shen
• Re: Generalizing the stats hierarchy Martin Thomson
• Generalizing the stats hierarchy Eric Rescorla
• Re: Some comments//Re: New version of editor draft for webrtc Harald Alvestrand
• RE: New Version Notification for draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry-00.txt Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry-00.txt Harald Alvestrand
• RE: What's the differences between webrtc and Adobe's Cirrus? Sunyang (Eric)
• Some comments//Re: New version of editor draft for webrtc Wangyahui

Saturday, 22 September 2012

• What's the differences between webrtc and Adobe's Cirrus? Li, Shen

Thursday, 20 September 2012

• New version of editor draft for webrtc Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

• Re: Interaction of AddStream and OfferToReceive Justin Uberti
• RE: Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Hutton, Andrew
• RE: Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Hutton, Andrew
• Re: Interaction of AddStream and OfferToReceive Eric Rescorla
• Re: Interaction of AddStream and OfferToReceive Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
• Interaction of AddStream and OfferToReceive Eric Rescorla
• Re: Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Stefan Hakansson LK
• RE: Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Hutton, Andrew
• Re: IdP issues (was: Needs to be more clearly described) Eric Rescorla
• Re: IdP issues (was: Needs to be more clearly described) Martin Thomson
• Re: IdP issues (was: Needs to be more clearly described) Harald Alvestrand

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

• Re: IdP issues (was: Needs to be more clearly described) Martin Thomson
• RE: IdP issues (was: Needs to be more clearly described) Jim Barnett
• Re: Background info about what is going on WebRTC / RTCWeb Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: IdP issues (was: Needs to be more clearly described) Martin Thomson
• Background info about what is going on WebRTC / RTCWeb Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• RE: IdP issues (was: Needs to be more clearly described) Jim Barnett
• [minutes] Sep 17 teleconf Dominique Hazael-Massieux

Monday, 17 September 2012

• Re: Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Martin Thomson
• Re: Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Some of the shortcoming of offer/answer + SDP based API Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: IdP issues (was: Needs to be more clearly described) Martin Thomson
• Re: Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Stefan Hakansson LK
• RE: Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Hutton, Andrew
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Needs to be more clearly described Eric Rescorla
• Re: Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Harald Alvestrand
• Needs to be more clearly described Martin Thomson
• Re: Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Martin Thomson
• Stats interface - Some comments on specific stats Hutton, Andrew
• Re: Sorting possible technical issues into categories Roman Shpount
• Sorting possible technical issues into categories Stefan Hakansson LK
• Agenda and details webrtc telco today Stefan Hakansson LK

Saturday, 15 September 2012

• [Bug 18889] RequestWWW bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18889] New: RequestWWW bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 14 September 2012

• RE: Phone call about ICE states Li Li
• Re: Stats interface - modelling on IndexedDB API? Harald Alvestrand

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

• RE: Phone call about ICE states srikar.rao@wipro.com

Thursday, 13 September 2012

• [Bug 18486] Let RTCSessionDescription take a Dictionary parameter bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18869] DataChannel should inherit EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18869] DataChannel should inherit EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18869] DataChannel should inherit EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18869] New: DataChannel should inherit EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: DataChannels API Adam Bergkvist
• Agenda items Monday's telco Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: DataChannels API Randell Jesup

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

• Re: DataChannels API Adam Bergkvist
• Re: DataChannels API Adam Bergkvist
• Re: DataChannels API Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Justin Uberti
• Re: DataChannels API Randell Jesup
• RE: DataChannels API Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

• Re: DataChannels API Randell Jesup
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Stefan Hakansson LK
• RE: DataChannels API Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
• RE: DataChannels API Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
• Re: DataChannels API Harald Alvestrand
• Re: DataChannels API Stefan Hakansson LK
• RE: Some of the shortcoming of offer/answer + SDP based API Jim Barnett
• Recording teleconfs (was: Next telco webrtc) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: DataChannels API Randell Jesup
• RE: DataChannels API Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
• Re: DataChannels API Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Some of the shortcoming of offer/answer + SDP based API Stefan Hakansson LK
• RE: Phone call about ICE states Venkatesan, Ganesh

Monday, 10 September 2012

• Re: Some of the shortcoming of offer/answer + SDP based API Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Some of the shortcoming of offer/answer + SDP based API Roman Shpount
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Justin Uberti
• Re: Some of the shortcoming of offer/answer + SDP based API Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Martin Thomson
• Some of the shortcoming of offer/answer + SDP based API Roman Shpount
• RE: Phone call about ICE states Venkatesan, Ganesh
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Justin Uberti
• RE: Phone call about ICE states Jim Barnett
• WebRTC Poll Result Analysis and Next Steps Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Justin Uberti

Saturday, 8 September 2012

• Re: Next telco webrtc Dan Burnett
• Re: Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Harald Alvestrand

Friday, 7 September 2012

• RE: Poll for preferred API alternative Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
• Re: Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Tim Panton
• Re: Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Tim Panton
• RE: DataChannels API Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
• Re: Next telco webrtc Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Next telco webrtc Maire Reavy
• RE: Next telco webrtc Christer Holmberg
• RE: Next telco webrtc Jim Barnett
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Salvatore Loreto
• Re: Next telco webrtc Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: Next telco webrtc Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• RE: Poll for preferred API alternative Göran Eriksson AP
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Dan Burnett
• Re: DataChannels API Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: DataChannels API Randell Jesup
• Re: DataChannels API Randell Jesup
• Re: Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: DataChannels API Stefan Hakansson LK
• Next telco webrtc Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: DataChannels API Stefan Hakansson LK

Thursday, 6 September 2012

• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative sajeesh sidharthan
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Frode Kileng

Friday, 7 September 2012

• Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Stefan Hakansson LK
• RE: Poll for preferred API alternative Sunyang (Eric)

Thursday, 6 September 2012

• Re: Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Ted Hardie
• Re: Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Göran Eriksson AP
• RE: Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Matthew Kaufman
• Re: Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Göran Eriksson AP
• RE: Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Matthew Kaufman
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Goals of this work (Re: Poll for preferred API alternative) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• RE: Poll for preferred API alternative Matthew Kaufman
• Re: IdP API Text Li Li
• RE: Poll for preferred API alternative Hutton, Andrew
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Stefan Hakansson LK
• RE: Poll for preferred API alternative Hutton, Andrew
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Harald Alvestrand
• RE: Poll for preferred API alternative Hutton, Andrew
• RE: On the subject of complexity Li Li
• RE: DataChannels API Jim Barnett
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Eric Rescorla
• Re: DataChannels API Randell Jesup
• Re: DataChannels API Adam Bergkvist
• Re: On the subject of complexity Harald Alvestrand
• Re: DataChannels API Randell Jesup
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Harald Alvestrand
• Re: DataChannels API Randell Jesup
• RE: Phone call about ICE states Jim Barnett
• Re: DataChannels API Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• RE: Phone call about ICE states Jim Barnett
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

Wednesday, 5 September 2012

• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Tim Panton
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Justin Uberti
• RE: Phone call about ICE states Jim Barnett
• Re: Phone call about ICE states Justin Uberti
• RE: Phone call about ICE states Jim Barnett
• Phone call about ICE states Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Interoperable signaling Neil Stratford
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Prakash
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Randell Jesup

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

• Interoperable signaling Justin Uberti
• Re: Transport change in MS Proposal Martin Thomson
• Re: On the subject of complexity Martin Thomson
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Eric Rescorla
• Re: stats interface - hierarchal stats Harald Alvestrand
• PeerConnection representation of MediaStreams that are sent/received Adam Bergkvist
• RE: stats interface - hierarchal stats Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Neil Stratford
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Justin Uberti
• Re: Do we need two ways of identifying m-lines? Justin Uberti
• Re: Feedback on the PeerConnection API Justin Uberti
• Re: Transport change in MS Proposal Randell Jesup

Monday, 3 September 2012

• Re: Open letter to the WebRTC Committees Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Transport change in MS Proposal Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: On the subject of complexity Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• stats interface - hierarchal stats Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Stats interface - modelling on IndexedDB API? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Do we need two ways of identifying m-lines? Eric Rescorla
• Re: ICE in MS Proposal Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Poll for preferred API alternative Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Do we need two ways of identifying m-lines? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Feedback on the PeerConnection API Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: DataChannels API Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: Doodle for new Telco Stefan Hakansson LK
• Re: Stats interface - modelling on IndexedDB API? Stefan Hakansson LK

Sunday, 2 September 2012

• Re: On the subject of complexity Tim Panton
• Re: Stats interface - modelling on IndexedDB API? Harald Alvestrand
• Re: DataChannels API Randell Jesup

Friday, 31 August 2012

• Open letter to the WebRTC Committees Ted Kozak

Saturday, 1 September 2012

• Re: DataChannels API Timothy B. Terriberry

Last message date: Friday, 28 September 2012 17:48:03 UTC