- From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:33:01 -0400
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 10/28/12 9:34 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > if we conclude that all m-lines should always > be accepted, independent of the tracks and constraints, but that they > should be set to a=inactive when the user doesn't want to use them, > that's a logical conclusion. > > But it's not the only possible one. IMO this is a bad idea. Even m-lines that are inactive require a transport address, ICE, and obligate sending and receiving RTCP. If you are offered a bunch of m-lines you have no use for you should not be forced to incur this cost. Thanks, Paul
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2012 21:33:29 UTC