- From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 06:49:36 +0000
- To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
- CC: "<public-webrtc@w3.org>" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Oct 25, 2012, at 17:54 , Timothy B. Terriberry <tterriberry@mozilla.com> wrote: > Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> I think the input -> display path should always be possible, no matter >> what the taints are - just like the <video> tag can display any incoming >> stream on the screen, no matter how tainted (I believe). >> >> However, if you like telecommuting in black & white, and go input -> JS >> decolorizer -> display, this would not work with tainted streams. > > The bigger problem, to my mind, is that it is now impossible to implement a level meter for the audio, so that people can check their mic. We can still provide one in browser chrome in gUM, but not after permission has been granted. > They can check their mic with a different stream. Really mic test level meters are probably best done as part of the browser were you select the device. Given the tradeoff between secure media, and a level meter, I know I want to have the option of secure media.
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2012 06:50:04 UTC