W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > October 2012

Re: First agenda draft f2f TPAC

From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:02:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBN2=4hEtTL5k2gFTq0gx9_mQTa1M+0r7k1gSLWdQV3bbg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
Stefan,

We also need to plan some time to discuss Identity (this was discussed on
the call the other day, but I guess it got lost).  I think it's in
pretty good shape
but there are some smaller issues that are still open, I think.

Here's an agenda item:

* Identity
  * Provider registration
  * Message passing details
  * Priority order
  * Interaction with certificate-based authentication

This seems like about 60 minutes worth of stuff.

Thanks,
-Ekr




On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Stefan Hakansson LK
<stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> The proposed agenda is now on the meeting Wiki:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/October_29_-_October_30_2012#Agenda
>
> We've added one topic: Implementation/test status
>
> Stefan for the chairs
>
>
> On 10/17/2012 02:28 PM, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> we've put together a draft agenda for the f2f meeting, see below. Please
>> let us know what you think. Should something be removed, something added?
>>
>> Also, we have proposed who will be responsible for each session. If you
>> have been assigned to something you for some reason don't want to do
>> please let us know. Also, if you would like to be involved in the
>> preparation of one or more sessions, let us know that.
>>
>> Stefan for the chairs
>>
>> Monday morning 0830--1200
>> =========================
>> * welcome and stuff
>>
>> * API functionality (MediaStream related) that has been discussed but is
>> not currently supported, what of this should we support in v1? - Stefan
>>
>> ** Sender side (all per track)
>> *** Priority
>> *** bw
>> *** width/height
>> *** agc toggle switch
>> *** bw/cong. feedback
>>
>> ** Receiver side
>> *** reject certain or all tracks in offer
>> **** should app be able to?
>> *** inform the sender of used / useful width/height
>> *** tell the sender that a stream/track is not played
>> (paused/unattached/ended)
>>
>> ** Not certain what side
>> *** Control of AEC (echo cancellation)
>>
>> ** Agree on what of the above we need
>> *** What in v1; what we can move to v2 but “make room for” in v1; what
>> we can’t see need for
>> *** One time, or possible to change?
>>
>> ** Discussion leads to requirements to IETF on SDP and RTCP capabilities
>>
>>
>> * Coffee break 1030-1045
>>
>> * SDP handling - Martin T, Cullen
>> ** How long is an SDP created with createOffer/Answer valid?
>> ** Rollback funtionality
>> *** at setLocal(offer) at offerer
>> *** at setRemote(offer) at answerer
>> *** at setLocal(answer) at answerer
>> *** at setRemote(answer) at offerer
>> *** What does an application do to recover when the UA rejects the set*
>> call?
>>
>>
>>
>> * Lunch 1200-1300
>>
>> Monday afternoon 1300-1800
>> ==========================
>> * General error handling principles - Anant
>>
>> * Call flows - Cullen’s sample flows - Cullen
>> ** Walk through a flow or two, verify that we understand what the
>> transitions mean
>>
>> * Stats - Harald
>> ** Conclude stats model
>> ** Specific stats for
>> *** Transports
>> *** ICE addresses / address pairs
>> *** ???
>>
>> * Conclude DTMF (we hope) - Harald, Justin
>>
>> * Finish for the day
>>
>>
>> Tuesday morning 0830-1200
>> =========================
>> * API functionality for remove stream - Harald
>> ** Empty indices in local/remoteStreams or not?
>>
>> * States - Cullen, Justin
>> ** PeerConnection
>> ** ICE agent
>> ** What is exposed to application?
>>
>> * End of WebRTC WG meeting (afternoon is Media Capture)
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 14:03:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:30 UTC