- From: Sunyang (Eric) <eric.sun@huawei.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:23:51 +0000
- To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 09:25:17 UTC
3264+4566, and I think RFC 3264 may need to be revised to use 4566 instead of 2327. And I think all browser need to support that, right? Yang Huawei From: Matthew Kaufman [mailto:matthew.kaufman@skype.net] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:07 AM To: public-webrtc@w3.org Subject: "SDP" The W3C WEBRTC specification refers to "SDP" and has a bibliography entry for "SDP". This entry points to RFC3264 ("An Offer/Answer Model with the Session Description Protocol (SDP)", and not in fact to any of the RFCs that describe SDP. RFC3264 itself points to RFC2327, which has been obsoleted by RFC4566. When the specification says things like "sdp of type DOMString, nullable - The string representation of the SDP" are we really trying to talk about the subset of RFC2327 that is covered by RFC3264, or do we really mean the SDP as described in RFC4566, or something else entirely? Matthew Kaufman
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 09:25:17 UTC