On 11/19/2012 8:10 AM, Randell Jesup wrote: > > This assumes that a MediaStream is the correct transfer mechanism (and > correct API at the W3 level), which is definitely something I meant "definitely not something I'd agree to at this point" (Thanks for pointing this out to me Harald) > I'd agree to at this point. I also wouldn't rule it out (I see some > arguments in favor, as well as against) - but this needs to occur in > public-webrtc@w3, and would do so before going too far down the path > here assuming a MediaStream is the mechanism. > > For this part of the conversation, I strongly suggest it occur on > public-webrtc, so reply there please. -- Randell Jesup randell-ietf@jesup.orgReceived on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 02:20:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:35 UTC