Re: [ACTION-43] (sdp related objects and global namespace) - way forward

On 06/27/2012 08:15 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Le mardi 26 juin 2012 à 20:20 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit :
>> Well, PeerConnection.localDescription and .remoteDescription would have
>> to be changed aswell since they are SessionDescription attributes, and
>> attributes cannot be dictionaries in WebIDL.
>
> Good point, I had missed that; I guess they would have to be declared as
> "object" with their actual structure defined in the prose.

So would not that be the same as what the SessionDescriptionCallback is 
provided with, e.g. an object à la {sdp:"m=lotsofmumbo", type:"offer"}?

>
> Dom
>

Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2012 09:10:09 UTC