W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [ACTION-43] (sdp related objects and global namespace) - way forward

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:04:10 +0200
Message-ID: <1339772650.3217.508.camel@altostratustier>
To: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
Le vendredi 15 juin 2012 à 12:02 +0200, Stefan Hakansson LK a écrit :
> I don't think that is the discussion ongoing. No-one is at all trying to 
> remove anything you can do with JSEP AFAIK. What is discussed seems 
> rather to be what you put in the meaning of an object, how we can avoid 
> polluting namespace, how we hit the right balance between easy to use 
> for the simple case and reasonably simple to use for the advanced case.

Indeed; just to clarify what I meant, my ideal API would be something
where if I don't want to deal with ICE/SDP (e.g. because I don't even
know these technologies exist), I don't have to manage it at all (e.g.
would just need to plug a signallingChannel somewhere, and magics would
happen), but if I want to, then I get all the JSEP power I need.

I've started to look into it, but haven't quite found the bandwidth to
come up with a reasonable proposal yet.

Received on Friday, 15 June 2012 15:04:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:28 UTC