- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:04:10 +0200
- To: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
Le vendredi 15 juin 2012 à 12:02 +0200, Stefan Hakansson LK a écrit : > I don't think that is the discussion ongoing. No-one is at all trying to > remove anything you can do with JSEP AFAIK. What is discussed seems > rather to be what you put in the meaning of an object, how we can avoid > polluting namespace, how we hit the right balance between easy to use > for the simple case and reasonably simple to use for the advanced case. Indeed; just to clarify what I meant, my ideal API would be something where if I don't want to deal with ICE/SDP (e.g. because I don't even know these technologies exist), I don't have to manage it at all (e.g. would just need to plug a signallingChannel somewhere, and magics would happen), but if I want to, then I get all the JSEP power I need. I've started to look into it, but haven't quite found the bandwidth to come up with a reasonable proposal yet. Dom
Received on Friday, 15 June 2012 15:04:46 UTC