- From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 05:51:32 -0400
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 6/13/2012 4:29 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 12 June 2012 23:19, Stefan Hakansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >> I still am not convinced about the need for this DataConnection object. >> Since there will be only one DataConnection per PeerConnection, there is a >> one-to-one mapping between them. What do the app developer (on anyone else) >> gain by us introducing the DataConnection object? > > This is only good if you assume that every PeerConnection has a data connection. I'm not convinced we need the DataConnection object. Anything you can do to one could be a method on PeerConnection. It makes it a little clearer if you want to drop all DataChannels. It gives you a convenient API/handle for finding out and keying off the state of the DataConnection/SCTP association (if it matters). It might be useful in some other context than PeerConnection. -- Randell Jesup randell-ietf@jesup.org
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 09:52:02 UTC