- From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:38:19 -0400
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 6/12/2012 5:22 AM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > Randell Jesup wrote: >> Also, we would not allow it to be set to a value lower than the number >> of active channels. > > Is there an advantage in allow it to be reduced at all? Not really; in the previous proposal it would increase automatically and never decrease. > Otherwise, an "ensureMaxStreams()" method or similar that only allows it > to be increased might make more sense than a writable attribute. Sure. I wasn't happy with the naming/definition for this. -- Randell Jesup randell-ietf@jesup.org
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 09:41:18 UTC