- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:07:13 +0100
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- CC: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F0F5991.1000601@alvestrand.no>
On 01/12/2012 10:02 PM, Justin Uberti wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com > <mailto:fluffy@cisco.com>> wrote: > > > I think we should do whatever Hickson is going to do for HTML5 spec. > What I can find in the HTML5 spec is a term called "enumerated attribute", which is used in quite a number of places: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#enumerated-attribute The number of occurences of "enumerated attribute" and of "const" seems to be on the same order of magnitude - ~30 of each. > > On Jan 10, 2012, at 2:10 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > > > Hello group, and happy 2012! > > > > One of the last discussions of 2011 was the discussion triggered > by Tab Atkins about numeric constants in the API: he strongly > recommended against them, and recommended that we instead use > strings (possibly in the special form of WebIDL enumerations, > which are mapped to JavaScript strings by the language binding. > > > > It seems to me clear from the discussion that: > > > > - The WebIDL community is strongly in favour of such a change > > - There has been weak or no real opposition to the idea in the > WebRTC WG > > - If such a change is to be made, it is better to do it as soon > as possible, so that implementations don't have to change after > significant deployment of code has been made. > > > > But it's a bit of work, and I don't want to ask the editors to > do it if there's the possibility that the WG could decide not to > do it anyway. > > > > I'm therefore calling for the WG's consensus to do this change. > > It affects at least the following: > > > > - MediaStreamTrack: readyState (LIVE, MUTE and ENDED) > > - PeerConnection: readyState, iceState and sdpState > > > > In all four cases, the current "const unsigned short" > declarations woudl be replaced with strings; as I understand the > enum spec from WebIDL [1], this: > > > > const unsigned short LIVE = 0; > > const unsigned short MUTED = 1; > > const unsigned short ENDED = 2; > > readonly attribute unsigned short readyState; > > > > would become this: > > > > enum ReadyStateType { "live", "muted", "ended" }; > > readonly attribute ReadyStateType readyState; > > > > Please comment on this - the chairs will attempt to draw a > conclusion based on mail arrived on Tuesday, Jan 17, at 9AM GMT (7 > days from now). > > > > Harald, for the chairs > > > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/ - latest draft 5 Jan 2012 > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 22:07:51 UTC