- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:07:13 +0100
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- CC: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F0F5991.1000601@alvestrand.no>
On 01/12/2012 10:02 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com
> <mailto:fluffy@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>
> I think we should do whatever Hickson is going to do for HTML5 spec.
>
What I can find in the HTML5 spec is a term called "enumerated
attribute", which is used in quite a number of places:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#enumerated-attribute
The number of occurences of "enumerated attribute" and of "const" seems
to be on the same order of magnitude - ~30 of each.
>
> On Jan 10, 2012, at 2:10 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>
> > Hello group, and happy 2012!
> >
> > One of the last discussions of 2011 was the discussion triggered
> by Tab Atkins about numeric constants in the API: he strongly
> recommended against them, and recommended that we instead use
> strings (possibly in the special form of WebIDL enumerations,
> which are mapped to JavaScript strings by the language binding.
> >
> > It seems to me clear from the discussion that:
> >
> > - The WebIDL community is strongly in favour of such a change
> > - There has been weak or no real opposition to the idea in the
> WebRTC WG
> > - If such a change is to be made, it is better to do it as soon
> as possible, so that implementations don't have to change after
> significant deployment of code has been made.
> >
> > But it's a bit of work, and I don't want to ask the editors to
> do it if there's the possibility that the WG could decide not to
> do it anyway.
> >
> > I'm therefore calling for the WG's consensus to do this change.
> > It affects at least the following:
> >
> > - MediaStreamTrack: readyState (LIVE, MUTE and ENDED)
> > - PeerConnection: readyState, iceState and sdpState
> >
> > In all four cases, the current "const unsigned short"
> declarations woudl be replaced with strings; as I understand the
> enum spec from WebIDL [1], this:
> >
> > const unsigned short LIVE = 0;
> > const unsigned short MUTED = 1;
> > const unsigned short ENDED = 2;
> > readonly attribute unsigned short readyState;
> >
> > would become this:
> >
> > enum ReadyStateType { "live", "muted", "ended" };
> > readonly attribute ReadyStateType readyState;
> >
> > Please comment on this - the chairs will attempt to draw a
> conclusion based on mail arrived on Tuesday, Jan 17, at 9AM GMT (7
> days from now).
> >
> > Harald, for the chairs
> >
> > [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/ - latest draft 5 Jan 2012
> >
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 22:07:51 UTC