On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > What worries me a bit about the WebIDL "enum" proposal is that the semantics > of unspecified values is left to the binding, which makes it hard to > generate consistent behaviour. Could you bring up this concern on public-webapps, where WebIDL is being developed? ~TJReceived on Monday, 2 January 2012 20:31:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:24 UTC