- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 08:25:46 -0800
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org, hta@google.com
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > What worries me a bit about the WebIDL "enum" proposal is that the semantics > of unspecified values is left to the binding, which makes it hard to > generate consistent behaviour. Could you bring up this concern on public-webapps, where WebIDL is being developed? ~TJ
Received on Monday, 2 January 2012 20:31:29 UTC