Re: Constraints structure and Capabilities API from Martin Thomson on 2012-02-23 (public-webrtc@w3.org from February 2012)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:59:33 -0800
To: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org, public-media-capture@w3.org
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWsnQ-tfBwO=CX92ArjSMCbEbCpSy0d8vGVMwV=XO5GGw@mail.gmail.com>

On 23 February 2012 12:29, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote:
> Cullen, Neil, Tim Panton, and I have come up with the following proposal for Constraints and for Capabilities.  The latter is for the trusted case.  We can work out a subset of information to provide in the case where the Javascript/web developer is not trusted.

Looks like a reasonable idea.  But every time I see a flat namespace
like that it makes me cringe.

Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 13:31:00 UTC