- From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:43:25 +0100
- To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
- Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
2012/2/20 Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>: > Actually codecs are a fairly bad example, since end point should be ready to > receive media encoded using any codec present in the offer. The fact that > one of the codecs was not present in the answer does not mean that remote > party is not planning to send media using this codec. Exactly. At least SDP offer/answer mechanism allows asymmetric codecs usage in the same media session, which means different codec in each direction of the media stream. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Monday, 20 February 2012 20:44:14 UTC