W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [MMUSIC] SDP work needed for WebRTC stuff

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 00:19:46 +0000
To: "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@rtfm.com>
Message-ID: <1.28e056a9fdad5dab98cf@cisco.com>
CC: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "mmusic WG" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "<public-webrtc@w3.org>" <public-webrtc@w3.org>

On Dec 8, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> +rtcweb
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
 <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> I was looking over everything that needs to be completed to finish a fist
 cut of the WebRTC related work. There are a handful of big SDP problems that
 are currently blocking some of the WebRTC work and I'd like to figure out
 how to make some progress on them.
> Let me loosely characterize them as
> 1) If we have several video streams, how do theses map up to 1 or more m
> 2) if we are doing port multiplexing, what does the SDP look like (the
 bundle problem)
> 3) How do we map the RTCWeb track and stream label concepts to identifiers
 in SDP
> 3) SDP for application running over SCTP/DTLS
> I don't want to speak for all the various chairs but I am under the
 impression that most of chairs of related groups in W3C and IETF believe these are
 issues that need to be resolved primarily in the MMUSIC WG and that they
 impact both WebRTC and CLUE as well as the general long term use of SDP in SIP
 and other protocols.
> I'd like to get some discussion going on how we can make some progress on
 these. I don't think we are going to solve these in 20 minutes of discussion
 at an IETF meeting so I think we probably need some interim (virtual or
 face to face) to sort this out.
> Thoughts?
> Wow, I'm totally confused here.
> I had assumed that the SDP-related issues were going to be the main
> topics at the WebRTC/RTCWEB interim in January. Is that not the case?

So far the interim was only talking about being a WebRTC & RTCWeb so this
 SDP stuff would be out of scope. Perhaps it would be better to have some of
 the time for mmusic topics? 

> IMO the lack of clarity around how to encode various media
> configurations into SDP is the major thing blocking progress here. In
> particular, Firefox has opted not to implement multiplexing of media
> streams over the same transport flow (whether of the bundle or
> multiple m-line variety) until the SDP for it is well-defined. The
> same thing applies to the question of how to map multiple m-lines to
> incoming MediaStreams/Tracks.
> We really need to cover these issues in the interim.
> -Ekr

mmusic mailing list
Received on Monday, 24 December 2012 07:36:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:32 UTC