- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:38:15 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 12/11/2012 07:34 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 11 December 2012 07:48, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> that's impossible to implement due to some WebKit limitations > This would seem to be the crux of the problems I'm seeing with this > proposal. There are objects under there, but I can't get at them > without going through some intermediary function calls. The pointer > stuff is just strange. > > Would it make a difference if you made the substitution: > s/dictionary/[NoInterfaceObject] interface/g ? Not much of a difference; if I can tell the difference aright, I also have to do s/^/attribute/, or s/$/()/ (making all the members either attributes or functions). The only thing "dictionary" buys me in that regard is slightly more compact syntax (the promise that there won't be any active functions on the objects is irrelevant since we're not using that functionality anyway).
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:38:45 UTC