- From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:43:39 -0700
- To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
- Cc: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> wrote: > > A poll which attempts to determine what creates the weakest objections for each > of the points of contention would be appropriate. (By, for instance, asking which > alternatives one could live with vs. what would be highly objectionable.) Just to simplify matters, would you like to suggest a set of common metrics we can use to assign scores to our level of objection? E.g. level 1="Poor wine pairing"and level 10="You killed my father, prepare to die."? I'd hate for us to start down this path and then get bogged down in dickering over what a "strong" objection is. Surely there must be a standard? Or, of course, we discuss the technical merits instead of our feelings. regards, Ted Hardie
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2012 23:44:06 UTC