- From: Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:03:10 -0700
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 8/29/12 5:30 AM, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote: > The two alternatives, as the chairs see them, are the following: > > 1) Continue with a design based on the PeerConnection object, using SDP > as part of the API, roughly in the style of the current API description. I support proceeding with a design based on PeerConnection. Numerous tweaks to the existing API description will no doubt be required, but I do not see the need to replace it with a lower level API. Regards, -Anant
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2012 21:03:42 UTC