- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:40:58 -0700
- To: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
> 4. Milestones and progress plan > Whether IdP API is part of V1 > Whether Data Channel is part of V1 I don't think that "should X be part of V1" is appropriate to have on Tuesday's agenda. I understand the urge to try to finish the spec, but what's holding it up isn't some particular set of features but rather that the basic functionality (permitted sequence of operations, error handling, structure of the objects, event handling) either isn't completely specified or doesn't have consensus. If we get to the point where everything else is ready to go and some feature is lagging, there will be plenty of time to discuss keep/cut then, but as things stand it's way premature and just distracts from the work that actually needs to be done. Since you ask about timeline: the one you have posted strikes me as extremely over-optimistic, especially if, as your agenda suggests, we are to seriously consider Microsoft's critique. -Ekr On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > All, > > this is the chair's first proposal for agenda items for the Tuesday Aug 28 > Telco. Please give us feedback! > > 1. Welcome, scribe > 2. Approve minutes > 3. MS’ CU-WebRTC proposal > Presentation > Questions and comments > 4. Milestones and progress plan > Whether IdP API is part of V1 > Whether Data Channel is part of V1 > Whether any other major mods to the specs are needed > Whether dates are realistic, given resolution of the items above > 5. Stats API - accept to include in spec > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Jun/0239.html > 6. IdP - possibly > 7. DTMF API - accept to move to PC and use 4-arg form > 8. JS API for interacting with congestion control > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15861 > 9. ICE state machine reporting up state (Cullen) > > //Stefan for chairs >
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 17:42:11 UTC