- From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:21:57 -0700
- To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, public-webrtc@w3.org
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 15:22:45 UTC
Jingle doesn't have the same index-based m= line concept, it does everything by <content/> name, which is mappable to "mid". I also think the m= index strategy has several shortcomings, so using "mid" when available allows us to avoid chaining ourselves to m= index. On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Harald Alvestrand > <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > > On 08/19/2012 05:46 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> > >> The current RTCIceCandidate type has two ways of identifying the m-line, > >> an m-line index (sdpMLineIndex) and an sdpMid, corresponding > >> to the RFC 3388 media stream identification value. > > > > The reason for the index is that we can't guarantee that a remote offer > will > > have unique labels on all its M-lines. > > > > For offers produced by WebRTC, we can choose to make them all have mid > > values (and they have to, if we use BUNDLE). > > Hmm... > > It sounds to me like index will always work but that label won't, so why > not just always use index? What am I missing? > > -Ekr > >
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 15:22:45 UTC