- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:50:46 -0700
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org
On 8/17/12, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > On 08/16/2012 08:17 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> On 16 August 2012 10:45, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >>> On 08/16/2012 02:42 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: >>>> On 14 August 2012 06:33, Stefan Hakansson LK >>>> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >>>>> Proposed milestones: >>>>> FPWD: Q3 2011 (MS already passed, met in Q4 2011) >>>>> LC: January 2013 >>>>> CR: March 2013 >>>>> PR: Q2 2013 >>>>> Rec: Q3 2012. >>>> These are aggressive. Have the chairs discussed splitting the work >>>> into smaller, more achievable portions so that more important items >>>> could be completed ahead of other lower priority items? >>> We think we have something close to the minimum set necessary to achieve >>> our >>> use cases now. If there are candidates for elimination that do not need >>> elimination of use cases, or if there are specific use cases that you >>> don't >>> think we should consider for V1, please speak up. >> That presumes that V1 is an atom. That's a pretty big atom. > V1 ("the first release") is an atom, in the sense that there can only be > one. >> >> Media and data channel seem readily separable. I'm not sure where we >> stand with the IdP stuff, but that would be another such piece. >> Apologies to my friends at Mozilla, who I know are deeply invested in >> these particular features, but I'm sure we will hear from them if my >> assessment on maturity is off-base. > Both of these features are also missing from the present Chrome release. > I don't think the full IdP stuff can make V1; it's unclear to me if an > interface can be defined that allows it to be specified separately and > used by V1 implementations if present. The current Firefox implementation has prototype implementations of both of these features. I will be providing a proposed interface for the IdP stuff shortly (it will be relatively similar to what was in my individual IETF I-D). -Ekr
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 15:51:14 UTC