Re: [MARKETING] [Bug 18486] Let RTCSessionDescription take a Dictionary parameter

I think I prefer the constructor that takes a string and also . Can we have both? is ther some reason dictionary is better than string? This is no something I feel strongly about but love to get some feedback on this change. 


On Aug 13, 2012, at 3:29 AM, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote:

> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18486
> 
> Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> changed:
> 
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 CC|                            |adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com
>         AssignedTo|public-webrtc@w3.org        |adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com
> 
> --- Comment #1 from Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> 2012-08-13 09:29:59 UTC ---
> It's nice that the constructor takes an object rather than a string of JSON.
> I'll go ahead and add this to the spec.
> 
> I'm not sure this cloning functionality works though:
>> sd2 = new RTCSessionDescription(sd);
> 
> -- 
> Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
> You are the assignee for the bug.
> 

Received on Monday, 13 August 2012 14:26:46 UTC