- From: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:26:08 +0200
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 08/08/2012 04:28 PM, Randell Jesup wrote: >> I agree in principle, but to me DTMF is only relevant for apps >> interoperating with legacy, and in those cases you need to also deploy >> e.g. an ICE terminating GW - in my view we could allow DTMF use to be >> a bit more complex since it is not relevant for the simple >> (browser-browser) case anyway. > > That's kind of my point - many apps may not know (especially in > federated cases) that they're talking to a PSTN legacy gateway and to an > IVR. Not sure I follow. Why would the app use DTMF at all if it wasn't (knowing that it was) talking to GW to legacy or to an IVR? > I'll agree an app designed to be a virtual softphone from a > company that provides PSTN gateways would likely include whatever is > needed to get working DTMF. So that why I suggest include a simple > default action on the event (assuming we define MediaStream events, > which I've suggested) and let the app override that. > > All that said, this isn't a big issue either way. Echo-cancelling local > feedback is more important. I agree to both points!
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 15:26:38 UTC