- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:53:10 -0700
- To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
- Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
I do as well, though I wonder if we really need three full days. The 1.5/.5 split we used in Sunnyvale seemed like enough. -Ekr On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org> wrote: > On 4/10/2012 9:40 AM, Dan Burnett wrote: >> >> I also believe this would be good to do. > > > I do also. > > >> On Apr 4, 2012, at 4:55 AM, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote: >> >>> The chairs propose that the webrtc WG arranges a one day face to face >>> meeting in conjunction with (and co-located with) the IETF rtcweb WG f2f >>> meeting. The rtcweb WG is planning for a 2 day event, and depending on when >>> that event will take place the webrtc WG could have its 1 day f2f either >>> right before or after the rtcweb meeting. >>> >>> The Doodle for the rtcweb meeting is available here: >>> http://doodle.com/nm3pp69znr3286cy (enter input to it _only_ if you intend >>> to participate in the IETF rtcweb meeting). >>> >>> *Make sure to respond to this mail if you do _not_ think that having a 1 >>> day webrtc meeting in conjunction with the rtcweb meeting makes sense* >>> (silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal). Of course, any >>> type of response/feedback is welcome. >>> >>> Stefan for the chairs > > > -- > Randell Jesup > randell-ietf@jesup.org > >
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 16:54:20 UTC