RE: Proposal to remove some implementation details

On 2 september 2011 01:56, Anant Narayanan wrote:
> This is actually an argument for removing this level of
> detail from the spec because it does not reflect the current
> stage of our thinking correctly. For instance, there is a
> proposal to change the option argument to be an object rather
> than a string, and providing details to parse it is pre-mature at
> this point. 

Then I think the proposal you mention should be discussed on this mailing list and the current text shouldn't be removed unless we have a proposal that motivates a change.

/Adam