On 2 september 2011 01:56, Anant Narayanan wrote: > This is actually an argument for removing this level of > detail from the spec because it does not reflect the current > stage of our thinking correctly. For instance, there is a > proposal to change the option argument to be an object rather > than a string, and providing details to parse it is pre-mature at > this point. Then I think the proposal you mention should be discussed on this mailing list and the current text shouldn't be removed unless we have a proposal that motivates a change. /AdamReceived on Monday, 5 September 2011 11:30:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:21 UTC