On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>wrote: > On 9/2/11 6:52 PM, Justin Uberti wrote: > >> >> I'm far from sold on RTP for this, but since I think we need a sequence >> number (for congestion control) and a stream id (for demux), it seems we're >> already halfway there. Will look at the other methods - do you recall if >> these were mentioned in a public draft or on the mailing list? >> > > There were two IDs... Cary did a presentation at the last meeting and is > preparing a combined draft. > > I believe there was discussion on the list as well from some RTP folks (or > maybe it was just at the microphone back in Prague?) about why putting data > in RTP is the wrong thing. > > Thanks, will look. Main concern is how SDES-SRTP works with something non-RTP. Maybe that isn't supported.Received on Friday, 2 September 2011 18:13:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:25 UTC