W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2011

RE: Use cases draft

From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:17:20 +0200
To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D6147C2BFE02@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se>

thanks for reading so carefully. Those reqs where removed late in the editing as it was decided to just focus on media stream stuff at the time. They read:

F20            Support for DTMF signaling

F21            Short messages (game state data) with short latency must be supported (The browser shall support      	            datagram peer-to-peer.) 

with A16 being an API to send/receive DTMF and A17 an API to send/receive data.


-----Original Message-----
From: public-webrtc-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webrtc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Francois Daoust
Sent: den 23 maj 2011 17:41
To: Göran Eriksson AP
Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: Re: Use cases draft

Thanks Göran,

On 05/19/2011 08:01 PM, Göran Eriksson AP wrote:
> Here is a link to the 'use case' document mentioned in the call today...
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holmberg-rtcweb-ucreqs-01

There are a couple of use cases which map to non existing requirements:
- 4.4.2 links to F21 and A17.
- 4.7.2 links to F20 and A16.

I suppose the mapping is incorrect. Or are there missing requirements?

Received on Thursday, 26 May 2011 12:17:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:19 UTC