RE: Use cases draft

Francois,

thanks for reading so carefully. Those reqs where removed late in the editing as it was decided to just focus on media stream stuff at the time. They read:

F20            Support for DTMF signaling

F21            Short messages (game state data) with short latency must be supported (The browser shall support      	            datagram peer-to-peer.) 

with A16 being an API to send/receive DTMF and A17 an API to send/receive data.

Stefan

-----Original Message-----
From: public-webrtc-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webrtc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Francois Daoust
Sent: den 23 maj 2011 17:41
To: Göran Eriksson AP
Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: Re: Use cases draft

Thanks Göran,

On 05/19/2011 08:01 PM, Göran Eriksson AP wrote:
> Here is a link to the 'use case' document mentioned in the call today...
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holmberg-rtcweb-ucreqs-01

There are a couple of use cases which map to non existing requirements:
- 4.4.2 links to F21 and A17.
- 4.7.2 links to F20 and A16.

I suppose the mapping is incorrect. Or are there missing requirements?

Francois.