Re: Moz/Cisco API proposal: multiple connections

On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, Anant Narayanan wrote:
> There's no reason that the PeerConnection object has to map the 
> underlying ICE negotiation exactly, but even if it does, our 
> PeerConnection factory proposal (PeerListener) allows for a web 
> developer to express his intent to create multiple PeerConnection 
> objects. In other words, it makes it easier for the developer to 
> establish a 1:many stream without having to create each PeerConnection 
> individually.

I'm not convinced it's much easier. Do you have any examples showing what 
a Web app would look like using your proposal to do 1:many so that I can 
compare it with what it would look like with the current spec?

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 21:25:30 UTC