Friday, 24 January 2025
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Editorial: Use exported CaptureController internal slots.
- [mediacapture-screen-share] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Editorial: Export CaptureController's internal slot definitions (#313)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Update explainer (#65)
- Closed: [mediacapture-surface-control] Rename `capturedzoomlevelchange` event to `zoomlevelchange` (#63)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Fix missed locations with capturedzoomlevelchange
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Rename `capturedzoomlevelchange` event to `zoomlevelchange` (#63)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Editorial: Export CaptureController's internal slot definitions (#313)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Rename `capturedzoomlevelchange` event to `zoomlevelchange` (#63)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Editorial: Export CaptureController's internal slot definitions (#313)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Change getZoomLevel() into a nullable attribute
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Editorial: Replace <code> with backticks
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Editorial: Export CaptureController's internal slot definitions
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Editorial proposal: Add extension hook (#312)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
Thursday, 23 January 2025
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add counters that support deployment of L4S (#792)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- [mediacapture-surface-control] oncapturedzoomlevelchange should fire a task (#60)
- Closed: [mediacapture-surface-control] Clarify "fire a blank event" for "capturedzoomlevelchange" (#50)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Clarify capturedzoomlevelchange (#57)
- Closed: [mediacapture-surface-control] Where do forwarded "wheel" events fire? (#51)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Replace setZoomLevel() with increase/decrease/reset methods
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Speaker devices may not always work with all microphones (#149)
- [mediacapture-output] Speaker devices may not always work with all microphones (#149)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] s/capturedzoomlevelchange/zoomlevelchange (#58)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: s/capturedzoomlevelchange/zoomlevelchange
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider dropping permission and making zoomLevel an attribute (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider dropping permission and making zoomLevel an attribute (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Clarify capturedzoomlevelchange
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Clarify where wheel events fire
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
Wednesday, 22 January 2025
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- [webrtc-stats] Need support for statistics for L4S (#793)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Should a web page allow to select specific types of event to be forwarded and not others (#47)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consideration of proposal to support zoom in/out (#40)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider dropping permission and making zoomLevel an attribute (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
Tuesday, 21 January 2025
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] API creates per-packet temporary objects, this is not ideal for GC (#77)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] API creates per-packet temporary objects, this is not ideal for GC (#77)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by henbos
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Bring Your Own Packets (#84)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Bring Your Own Packets (#84)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
Saturday, 18 January 2025
Friday, 17 January 2025
- [mediacapture-main] Should we revisit and document getUserMedia() track order? (#1028)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the order of events being track clones? (#1020)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] What holds on to RTCOfferOptions and its iceRestart member (#3028)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] What holds on to RTCOfferOptions and its iceRestart member (#3028)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add counters that support deployment of L4S (#792)
Thursday, 16 January 2025
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Add counters that support deployment of L4S
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] What about touch-based scrolling? (#54)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
Wednesday, 15 January 2025
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] What about touch-based scrolling? (#54)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Use USVString for url attributes and members (#3029)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Use USVString for url attributes and members (#3029)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
Tuesday, 14 January 2025
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Bring Your Own Packets (#84)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] What about touch-based scrolling? (#54)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
Monday, 13 January 2025
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] What about touch-based scrolling? (#54)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] What about touch-based scrolling? (#54)
- [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Bring Your Own Packets
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
Friday, 10 January 2025
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Editorial: Add missing nullability (#53)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Editorial: Add missing nullability
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add WebRTC-specific interactions with capture/receive/RTP timestamps (#224)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
Thursday, 9 January 2025
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] No transfer steps defined for RTCEncodedAudioFrame and RTCEncodedVideoFrame (#231)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add WebRTC-specific interactions with capture/receive/RTP timestamps (#224)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Codec negotiation and level IDs (#3020)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023)
Tuesday, 7 January 2025
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mst-content-hint] Default degradationPreference value? (#37)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Missing tasks in parallel steps in Captured Surface Control (#52)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Wrong Web IDL type for URLs in Identifiers for WebRTC's Statistics API (#791)
- [webrtc-pc] Wrong Web IDL type for URLs in WebRTC: Real-Time Communication in Browsers (#3031)
- [webrtc-stats] Wrong Web IDL type for URLs in Identifiers for WebRTC's Statistics API (#791)
- [webrtc-identity] Wrong Web IDL type for URLs in Identity for WebRTC 1.0 (#42)
Monday, 6 January 2025
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom