Saturday, 28 February 2026
Friday, 27 February 2026
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
Thursday, 26 February 2026
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCError should be exposed on Workers (#3092)
- [webrtc-pc] RTCError should be exposed on Workers (#3092)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Break out connection establishment control into a modular API. (#106)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Break out connection establishment control into a modular API.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Update description of getParameters() (#3091)
- [webrtc-pc] Update description of getParameters() (#3091)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by guidou
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
- [webrtc-pc] Should garbage collecting RTCPeerConnection be observable? (#3090)
Tuesday, 24 February 2026
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Support p2p without ICE (have ICE-less "formats") (#102)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add algorithm for browser automation. (#328)
- [mediacapture-viewport] Pull Request: Add an algorithm for the browser automation.
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Support p2p without ICE (have ICE-less "formats") (#102)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Survive going to sleep and coming back (#105)
- [webrtc-pc] RTCPeerConnectionIceErrorEventInit should have either default values for properties or use required with them (#3089)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Survive going to sleep and coming back (#105)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Control over ICE (ICE Controller and changing TURN/STUN servers) (#100)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Don't automatically use a Wake Lock (#104)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Control over ICE (ICE Controller and changing TURN/STUN servers) (#100)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Control over ICE (ICE Controller and changing TURN/STUN servers) (#100)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Control over ICE (ICE Controller and changing TURN/STUN servers) (#100)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Support p2p without ICE (have ICE-less "formats") (#102)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Control over ICE (ICE Controller and changing TURN/STUN servers) (#100)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Does maxPacketsizeBytes include packet overhead and MTU discovery (is it dynamic)? (#103)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Support p2p without ICE (have ICE-less "formats") (#102)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Should supportedFormats be static? (#101)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Control over ICE (ICE Controller and changing TURN/STUN servers) (#100)
Monday, 23 February 2026
- Re: [webrtc-pc] [[IceRole]] initialized too late (#3088)
- [webrtc-pc] [[IceRole]] initialized too late (#3088)
Thursday, 19 February 2026
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Add basic certificate/fingerprint control.
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by youennf
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by youennf
Wednesday, 18 February 2026
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by youennf
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Automatic keep alive of local candidates.
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Add startGatheringHostCandidates function.
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Getter for the maximum payload size for a given candidate pair.
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add a way to get capabilities before capture starts (#329)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add SFrame packetization handling for SFrameTransform (#252)
Tuesday, 17 February 2026
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Questioning why we need to change Script transform on the fly (#299)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Questioning why we need to change Script transform on the fly (#299)
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Questioning why we need to change Script transform on the fly (#299)
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Questioning the value of the ability to change SFrame transform on the fly (#298)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] What is the scope of the circuit breaker ? (#92)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Are HighResTimeStamps allowed? (#91)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Are HighResTimeStamps allowed? (#91)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] What is the scope of the circuit breaker ? (#92)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] What is the scope of the circuit breaker ? (#92)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Are HighResTimeStamps allowed? (#91)
Monday, 16 February 2026
Sunday, 15 February 2026
Friday, 13 February 2026
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Make Philipel-WebRTC "admin" of the webrtc-rtptransport repo. (#95)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Make Philipel-WebRTC "admin" of the webrtc-rtptransport repo. (#95)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Do we need an ICE restart function? (#93)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Make Philipel-WebRTC "admin" of the webrtc-rtptransport repo. (#95)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] RTP/SRTP support? (#94)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Do we need an ICE restart function? (#93)
Thursday, 12 February 2026
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add algorithm for browser automation. (#328)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add algorithm for browser automation. (#328)
Wednesday, 11 February 2026
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
Tuesday, 10 February 2026
- [webrtc-rtptransport] What is the scope of the circuit breaker ? (#92)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Are HighResTimeStamps allowed? (#91)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] MTU is path dependent (#90)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Per-packet notifications are mandatory, this is not ideal for context switching (#78)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Per-packet notifications are mandatory, this is not ideal for context switching (#78)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] How does RTCRtpTranport(Processor) work with RTCRtpSendStream/RTCRtpReceiveStream? (#71)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Should RTCRtpTransport(Processor) use event handlers for packet notifications? (#70)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] No signal when transport path change. (#57)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Custom BWE without pacing is not well supported. (#56)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Custom BWE without pacing is not well supported. (#56)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Add stats on queued event drops when apps aren't keeping up with reading (#55)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Controls of internal queue lengths (#54)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Controls of internal queue lengths (#54)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] There are two `readPacketizedRtp` functions. (#49)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] RtpTransport and transport re-direction (#48)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Packet forwarding is not supported (#40)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Packet prioritization is not supported. (#38)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Packet prioritization is not supported. (#38)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Should `RtpSendStream` and `RtpReceiveStream` be removed? (#47)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Should RtpSendStream/RtpReceiveStream be transferable? (#36)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] RtpSendStreamInit and RtpReceiveStreamInit are not defined in explainer-use-case-1.md (#35)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Only allow RtpTransport (max-bundle) (#34)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Make RtpTransportProcessor transferable (#33)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] How do the two `sendRtp` functions interact? (#32)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Custom extensions not supported (#29)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Clarify RTCP use of Use Case 1 (#27)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Clarify RTCP use of Use Case 1 (#27)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Not requiring per-packet JS Events (#20)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Not requiring per-packet JS Events (#20)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Examples pipe multiple streams into a single writable (#15)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Examples pipe multiple streams into a single writable (#15)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Update examples to use standard APIs (#14)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Workers (#13)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Arbitrary RTP Header Extensions (#12)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Arbitrary RTCP messages (#11)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] SDP "Bumper lanes" (#10)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] SDP "Bumper lanes" (#10)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Support L4S RFC8888 (#82)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Support L4S RFC8888 (#82)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Packet sender needs to expose a signal about max packet size (#83)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Add control over the feedback interval for Custom Congestion Control Use Case (#85)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Send/Receive PLI/FIR (#86)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Send/Receive PLI/FIR (#86)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Expose L4S bits on the receiver side (#87)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Customizing piecemeal (#9)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Customizing piecemeal (#9)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] WHATWG Streams support? (#8)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] WHATWG Streams support? (#8)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] How does cryptex work? (#7)
- Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] How does cryptex work? (#7)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by pthatcher
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
Monday, 9 February 2026
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Web IDL hiccup: `SFrameTransformOptions` still used in constructors (#296)
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Revert the renaming of SFrameTransformOptions to RTCSFrameTransformOptions
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Web IDL hiccup: `SFrameTransformOptions` still used in constructors (#296)
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Web IDL hiccup: `SFrameTransformOptions` still used in constructors (#296)
Friday, 6 February 2026
Thursday, 5 February 2026
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] new commits pushed by youennf
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
Wednesday, 4 February 2026
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Add sframe script transform support
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Make sure to get the error link event correct and update the key name
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Add per packet sframe option
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Expose an API to turn on per-packet sframe native support (#292)