Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] SFrameTransform interface has two heads (#262)

@jan-ivar `SFrameEncrypterStream` and `SFrameDecrypterStream` approach sounds promising, especially for the cases if user doesnt care about getting transform stream. It would rely on sframe implementation being synchronous directly in the browser code.

Wondering if for such case it would make sense to extend currently proposed `transform` property or rather a new one property to sender / receiver interfaces

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by k-wasniowski
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-encoded-transform/issues/262#issuecomment-3263177388 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Saturday, 6 September 2025 20:07:59 UTC