[mediacapture-surface-control] Improve forwarding behavior in the overlay case (#69)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Improve forwarding behavior in the overlay case (#69)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Improve forwarding behavior in the overlay case (#69)
[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix: Missing tasks in parallel steps
[webrtc-pc] Missing tasks in parallel steps in WebRTC: Real-Time Communication in Browsers (#3032)
[webrtc-encoded-transform] Missing tasks in parallel steps in WebRTC Encoded Transform (#236)
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Fix: Missing tasks in parallel steps in Captured Surface Control
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Fix: Missing tasks in parallel steps in Captured Surface Control (#68)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Fix: Missing tasks in parallel steps in Captured Surface Control (#68)
[mediacapture-surface-control] Novel interception of input has undesirable side-effects (#67)
[mediacapture-main] Should applyConstraints reject when track is muted? (#1029)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should applyConstraints reject when track is muted? (#1029)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should applyConstraints reject when track is muted? (#1029)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should applyConstraints reject when track is muted? (#1029)
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Editorial: Use exported CaptureController internal slots.
[mediacapture-screen-share] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
[mediacapture-surface-control] Update explainer (#65)
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Fix missed locations with capturedzoomlevelchange
[mediacapture-surface-control] Rename `capturedzoomlevelchange` event to `zoomlevelchange` (#63)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Rename `capturedzoomlevelchange` event to `zoomlevelchange` (#63)
- Closed: [mediacapture-surface-control] Rename `capturedzoomlevelchange` event to `zoomlevelchange` (#63)
[mediacapture-screen-share] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Change getZoomLevel() into a nullable attribute
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Editorial: Replace <code> with backticks
[mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Editorial: Export CaptureController's internal slot definitions
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Editorial: Export CaptureController's internal slot definitions (#313)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Editorial: Export CaptureController's internal slot definitions (#313)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Editorial: Export CaptureController's internal slot definitions (#313)
[mediacapture-screen-share] Editorial proposal: Add extension hook (#312)
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] oncapturedzoomlevelchange should fire a task (#60)
Closed: [mediacapture-surface-control] Clarify "fire a blank event" for "capturedzoomlevelchange" (#50)
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
Closed: [mediacapture-surface-control] Where do forwarded "wheel" events fire? (#51)
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Replace setZoomLevel() with increase/decrease/reset methods
[mediacapture-output] Speaker devices may not always work with all microphones (#149)
[mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: s/capturedzoomlevelchange/zoomlevelchange
[mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Clarify capturedzoomlevelchange
[mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Clarify where wheel events fire
[mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider window capture (#55)
[webrtc-stats] Need support for statistics for L4S (#793)
Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Should a web page allow to select specific types of event to be forwarded and not others (#47)
Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consideration of proposal to support zoom in/out (#40)
Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider dropping permission and making zoomLevel an attribute (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider dropping permission and making zoomLevel an attribute (#27)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider dropping permission and making zoomLevel an attribute (#27)
Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42)
Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] API creates per-packet temporary objects, this is not ideal for GC (#77)
Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] API creates per-packet temporary objects, this is not ideal for GC (#77)
[webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by henbos
Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Suggest User Agents treat a captured tab as visible (#307)
[mediacapture-main] Should we revisit and document getUserMedia() track order? (#1028)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we revisit and document getUserMedia() track order? (#1028)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we revisit and document getUserMedia() track order? (#1028)
Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the order of events being track clones? (#1020)
Re: [webrtc-pc] What holds on to RTCOfferOptions and its iceRestart member (#3028)
Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147)
[webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Add counters that support deployment of L4S
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add counters that support deployment of L4S (#792)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add counters that support deployment of L4S (#792)
[mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] allow="microphone" should authorize setSinkId (#148)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Use USVString for url attributes and members (#3029)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Use USVString for url attributes and members (#3029)
[mediacapture-surface-control] What about touch-based scrolling? (#54)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] What about touch-based scrolling? (#54)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] What about touch-based scrolling? (#54)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] What about touch-based scrolling? (#54)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] What about touch-based scrolling? (#54)
[mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to interact with a device without a fixed capability? (#1027)
[webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Bring Your Own Packets
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Bring Your Own Packets (#84)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Bring Your Own Packets (#84)
- Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Bring Your Own Packets (#84)
[mediacapture-surface-control] new commits pushed by eladalon1983
[mediacapture-surface-control] Pull Request: Editorial: Add missing nullability
Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] No transfer steps defined for RTCEncodedAudioFrame and RTCEncodedVideoFrame (#231)
Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack or to DOM objects? (#45)
Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add WebRTC-specific interactions with capture/receive/RTP timestamps (#224)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Codec negotiation and level IDs (#3020)
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos
Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023)
Re: [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116)
Re: [mst-content-hint] Default degradationPreference value? (#37)
[mediacapture-surface-control] Missing tasks in parallel steps in Captured Surface Control (#52)
[webrtc-pc] Wrong Web IDL type for URLs in WebRTC: Real-Time Communication in Browsers (#3031)
[webrtc-stats] Wrong Web IDL type for URLs in Identifiers for WebRTC's Statistics API (#791)
[webrtc-identity] Wrong Web IDL type for URLs in Identity for WebRTC 1.0 (#42)
[mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
Re: [mediacapture-record] Creation of Seekable Files (#119)
Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113)