Bernard Aboba via GitHub
Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
dontcallmedom-bot via GitHub
Elad Alon via GitHub
Erik Språng via GitHub
François Daoust via GitHub
guidou via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Thursday, 12 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] add receiveTime to metadata (#235) (Monday, 2 December)
Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
henbos via GitHub
Jamie Kyle via GitHub
Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub
- Re: [mst-content-hint] Should the spec provide guideline on the default degradation preference to use for capture tracks? (#60) (Friday, 20 December)
- Re: [mst-content-hint] Should the spec provide guideline on the default degradation preference to use for capture tracks? (#60) (Friday, 20 December)
- Re: [mst-content-hint] Default degradationPreference value? (#37) (Friday, 20 December)
- Re: [mst-content-hint] What is the value of degradationPreference over time? (replaceTrack, contentHint setter) (#36) (Friday, 20 December)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Thursday, 19 December)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] new commits pushed by jan-ivar (Thursday, 19 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Wednesday, 18 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#45) (Monday, 16 December)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Missed a spot that should use HTMLMediaElement's potentially playing definition (Friday, 13 December)
- [mediacapture-main] currentTime still references undefined "playing" state (#1024) (Friday, 13 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113) (Thursday, 12 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Tuesday, 10 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] What is the expected timing of MSTP video frame enqueuing with other track events (configurationchange, applyConstraints promise resolution) (#115) (Tuesday, 10 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Tuesday, 10 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Tuesday, 10 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Tuesday, 10 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Monday, 9 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Monday, 9 December)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Add captureTimestamp and senderCaptureTimeOffset to frame metadata (#228) (Thursday, 5 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the purpose of requiring a successful gUM call before enumerateDevices? (#1019) (Wednesday, 4 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the purpose of requiring a successful gUM call before enumerateDevices? (#1019) (Tuesday, 3 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116) (Monday, 2 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116) (Monday, 2 December)
Luke Bermingham via GitHub
Philipp Hancke via GitHub
Sam Sneddon via GitHub
Tove Petersson via GitHub
Tristan Fraipont via GitHub
W3C Bot via GitHub
youennf via GitHub
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] currentTime still references undefined "playing" state (#1024) (Thursday, 19 December)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by youennf (Thursday, 19 December)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Add deviceId as settings and constraints for screen share video tracks. (Thursday, 19 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Wednesday, 18 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Thursday, 12 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Thursday, 12 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] We shouldn't require track transferability (#113) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Wednesday, 11 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Tuesday, 10 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Tuesday, 10 December)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Thursday, 5 December)
Last message date: Monday, 23 December 2024 00:24:05 UTC