- From: Tim Panton via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:49:56 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
In the TPAC meeting Henrik mentioned a variant of proposal B - adding a member to the pc.oniceconnectionstatechange data that is the iceTransport that it relates to - this seems cleaner and simpler than adding an (array of) iceTransports properties to the Peer connection. I don't like surfacing a (potentially ghost) sctpTransport who's values are wrong or non-existent just to get an iceTransport. -- GitHub Notification of comment by steely-glint Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/2899#issuecomment-1715663550 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2023 12:49:58 UTC