W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > October 2022

Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should the handle be an object? (#68)

From: Elad Alon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 17:27:31 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-1290898804-1666718849-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> I don't find loosely-coupled pages advertising crop regions compelling enough to bake into the web platform now.
> I don't find loosely-coupled pages advertising content hints compelling enough to bake into the web platform now.

I might have been premature in moving Capture Handle from the WICG to the WebRTC Working Group. It's unclear to me that we are aligned on the vision here. I've also not heard of any concrete plans from Firefox or Safari to implement the spec, so the timelines we have in mind are going to be different. Shall we rectify this mistake by moving the spec back to the WICG?

> > > we seem overdue for the third option IMHO... a rudimentary messaging API.
> > 
> > Do we agree on this?
> I remain curious about an answer to this question.

If you mean Capture Actions - I have been supportive multiple times. But this is an orthogonal use-case.
If you mean adding a MessagePort - I have proposed that in the very first message in the current thread.

GitHub Notification of comment by eladalon1983
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-handle/issues/68#issuecomment-1290898804 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2022 17:27:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:59 UTC