W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > October 2022

Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should the handle be an object? (#68)

From: Elad Alon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:25:52 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-1286032655-1666293950-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> Self-censorhip is already possible in the current spec once the capturer establishes a "connection".

The current spec does NOT force an establishment of a connection. My [proposal](https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-handle/issues/68#issuecomment-1282898580) shows a simple mechanism for publishing actionable information without requiring a connection. That proposal was designed **precisely** to address the concerns you have previously raised, which were (1) self-censorship and (2) usefulness to loosely-coupled apps.

> I don't think we should solve more features for loosely-coupled applications atm.

Could you please explain this 180-degrees change in your position?

GitHub Notification of comment by eladalon1983
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-handle/issues/68#issuecomment-1286032655 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2022 19:25:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:59 UTC