Thursday, 31 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Fix ReSpec - conformance section (#39)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Fix ReSpec - conformance section
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Advance document to FPWD
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be available to Elements and not only HTMLElements (#13)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] s/HTMLElement/Element (#35)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: s/HTMLElement/Element
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget and cropTo algorithms should be based on existing HTML/CSS definitions (#20)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should be made serializable (#21)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Define serialization steps
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: s/HTMLElement/Element
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Fix formatting
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Decisions concerning clones (#2)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] Decisions concerning clones (#2)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is BrowserCaptureMediaStreamTrack needed? (#10)
Tuesday, 29 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Use case 1 presumes tight integration (#4)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
Monday, 28 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32)
Friday, 25 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] 'label' needs direction and language metadata (#665)
Thursday, 24 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] cropTo is returning promises but it is unclear when promises are supposed to be rejected synchronously or not (#14)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] Timing of cropTo promise resolution with media capture-transform (#12)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be exposed to worker (#25)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Delete identity/README.md
Wednesday, 23 March 2022
- [mediacapture-main] enumerateDevices() should request permission (#874)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Fix WebIDL for constructor (#45)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Fix WebIDL for constructor
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Tab capture restriction (#43)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Specify requirement of exposure: tab-capture
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Add a note stating the intent to get consistency between cropTo promise resolution and enqueueuing in the ReadableStream
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Add source specific handling for creation and cloning of tracks
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- [mediacapture-handle] Tab capture restriction (#43)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity][Enhancement] Expose contentHint (#35)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: [mediacapture-handle-identity] Align with Web IDL specification
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: [mediacapture-handle-actions] Align with Web IDL specification
Tuesday, 22 March 2022
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add support for negotiating datachannels in SDP (RFC8864) (#102)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add support for negotiating datachannels in SDP (RFC8864) (#102)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add support for negotiating datachannels in SDP (RFC8864) (#102)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Disabling hardware acceleration (#98)
- [mediacapture-region] [Region capture] Statement of support from Google (#31)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Define DisplayMediaStreamConstraints.currentTabPreference
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Remove the "application" DisplayCaptureSurfaceType
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Remove the "application" DisplayCaptureSurfaceType (#214)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Remove the "application" DisplayCaptureSurfaceType
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec-hooks requested (#213)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec-hooks requested (#213)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Specify 1024 16-bit characters limitation in setCaptureHandleConfig (#33)
Monday, 21 March 2022
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Ability to persist RTCPeerconnection connection state (#101)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Ability to persist RTCPeerconnection connection state (#101)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add support for negotiating datachannels in SDP (RFC8864) (#102)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29)
- [webrtc-extensions] Add support for negotiating datachannels in SDP (RFC8864) (#102)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Expose CropTarget in Workers
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be exposed to worker (#25)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be exposed to worker (#25)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be exposed to worker (#25)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be available to Elements and not only HTMLElements (#13)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be available to Elements and not only HTMLElements (#13)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be exposed to worker (#25)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29)
- [webrtc-extensions] Ability to persist RTCPeerconnection connection state (#101)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to ReSpec version 32.1.0
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version 32.1.0
Sunday, 20 March 2022
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Disabling hardware acceleration (#98)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Disabling hardware acceleration (#98)
Friday, 18 March 2022
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Synchronous/asynchronous Promise rejection
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Document issues with no consensus
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Document points of no consensus (#26)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Document points of no consensus
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be available to Elements and not only HTMLElements (#13)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probable be exposed to worker (#25)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be available to Elements and not only HTMLElements (#13)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget and cropTo algorithms should be based on existing HTML/CSS definitions (#20)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100)
- Closed: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Statement of Support from Citrix (#14)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Statement of Support from Citrix (#14)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Actions] "Actions" model should be aligned with "mediasession actions" (#36)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Add Actions section from January WebRTC interim (#15)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Beef up privacy and security section with regards to the various risks related to the different surfaces (#212)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Beef up privacy and security section with regards to the various risks related to the different surfaces (#212)
Thursday, 17 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Actions] "Actions" model should be aligned with "mediasession actions" (#36)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Statement of Support from Citrix (#14)
- Closed: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update Actions spec status to ED
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Add Actions section from January WebRTC interim (#15)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Clarify this describes a mechanism for tab capture only
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Limit to tab-capture. (#10)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget and cropTo algorithms should be based on existing HTML/CSS definitions (#20)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100)
- [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probable be exposed to worker (#25)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] Remove language related to muting cropped tracks (#22)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Beef up privacy and security section with regards to the various risks related to the different surfaces (#212)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Beef up privacy and security section with regards to the various risks related to the different surfaces (#211)
Wednesday, 16 March 2022
- Re: [webrtc-svc] SVC getCapabilities() is redundant with Media Capabilities query (#49)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68)
- Closed: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] sdpFmtpLine prose is vague about which SDP to use (#2710)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Use the displaySurface constraint to signal application preference (#186)
- [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100)
- [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38)
Tuesday, 15 March 2022
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Closed: [mediacapture-handle] Integrate the Actions compromise presented at January WebRTC interim (#6)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Integrate the Actions compromise presented at January WebRTC interim (#6)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Remove responsible doc
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Use case for actions: Presentation automation (#37)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- [mediacapture-handle] Use case for actions: Presentation automation (#37)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- [mediacapture-handle] "Actions" model should be aligned with "mediasession actions" (#36)
Monday, 14 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- [mediacapture-main] Replace usage of "responsible document" (#871)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] PR Preview doesn't appear to support multiple documents. (#29)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Multi-capture (concurrent capture of multiple surfaces) (#204)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Split doc into identity.html and actions.html (#16)
- [mediacapture-output] Pull Request: Editorial: use associated Document in place of responsible document
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Multi-capture (concurrent capture of multiple surfaces) (#204)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Multi-capture (concurrent capture of multiple surfaces) (#204)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Improvement: Expose contentHint (#35)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to ReSpec version 32.0.1
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version 32.0.1
Friday, 11 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] .getCaptureHandle() seems misplaced on the track (#12)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Split doc into identity.html and actions.html (#16)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update Identity to reflect adoption
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
Thursday, 10 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Specify 1024 16-bit characters limitation in setCaptureHandleConfig (#33)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Specify 1024 16-bit characters limitation in setCaptureHandleConfig
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Add Jan-Ivar as an editor for Identity (#20)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Add Jan-Ivar as an editor for Identity
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Add Jan-Ivar as an editor for Identity (#20)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Actions editors
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Fix permissions on repo (#30)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Fix permissions on repo (#30)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Fix permissions on repo (#30)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Video with audio element pause after play during phone call (#869)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Add Actions section from January WebRTC interim (#15)
- [mediacapture-handle] Fix permissions on repo (#30)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Split doc into identity.html and actions.html (#16)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Split doc into identity.html and actions.html (#16)
Wednesday, 9 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Split doc into identity.html and actions.html (#16)
- [mediacapture-handle] PR Preview doesn't appear to support multiple documents. (#29)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Video with audio element pause after play during phone call (#869)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md
- [mediacapture-main] Video with audio element pause after play during phone call (#869)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
Tuesday, 8 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update link for filing feedback (not WICG anymore)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Make CropTarget serializable
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Specify sub-type requirement for cloning tracks (#864)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Remove discussion of mute
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is muting track the right call for empty cropped tracks (#9)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] outbound-rtp.scaleResolutionDownBy (#620)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is muting track the right call for empty cropped tracks (#9)
- [mediacapture-region] Remove language related to muting cropped tracks (#22)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Conditional Focus (When Display-Capture Starts) (#190)
Monday, 7 March 2022
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update Origin Trial token
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update captured.html
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Editorial: slightly better use of ReSpec stuff
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Editorial: link up add/remove track defs
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Editorial: fix dual definition of permission strings
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to ReSpec version 31.0.11
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version 31.0.11
Friday, 4 March 2022
Thursday, 3 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Controlling 3rd party iframe audio output on a page? (#63)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Specify sub-type requirement for cloning tracks (#864)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Controlling 3rd party iframe audio output on a page? (#63)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Specify sub-type requirement for cloning tracks
- Closed: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68)
Wednesday, 2 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Multi-capture (concurrent capture of multiple surfaces) (#204)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81)
Tuesday, 1 March 2022
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Document substantive changes since Rec as candidate amendments (#2713)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81)