Re: [webrtc-pc] Simulcast: Implementations do not fail (and that seems good) (#2762)

Regarding 2 and 3, erroring out when a remote SDP tries to narrow the envelope would violate the base IETF spec, IMO. Base spec requires us to allow this. Whether this breaks webrtc-pc is another question, but my position is that webrtc-pc should not be contradicting the IETF spec that it is based on.

Regarding 6, this seems wrong. If offer/answer removes a rid by narrowing the envelope (which I think needs to be allowed, see previous line), it should probably not show up in JS anymore.

Regarding 7, that's just bonkers. An answer that contains rids that the offer did not is invalid per base spec, and should result in an error.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by docfaraday
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/2762#issuecomment-1205366956 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 4 August 2022 14:52:25 UTC