Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add a CSP check to RTCPeerConnection.addIceCandidate(). (#81)

> Are you suggesting there are code paths specifically for non-blocked ports? That sounds rather wonky.

It could very well be that I'm wrong on that. What I did was look at it from a top-down perspective. There's just a lot more places in WebRTC where connections are spawned than for example in the usual HTTP client implementation. Maybe Harald or Jan-Ivar can clarify better if that would be hard to implement.

> It's not clear to me we want to reveal the CSP restrictions directly to a potential attacker. If the website wanted to convey its CSP policy it can already, right?

Ok, fair.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by lgrahl
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-extensions/pull/81#issuecomment-978976713 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 25 November 2021 08:57:43 UTC