Saturday, 30 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Must the alpha channel be preserved, and what about encoding in an alpha-less format? (#30)
- Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Must the alpha channel be preserved, and what about encoding in an alpha-less format? (#30)
Friday, 29 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-main] should enumerateDevices list infrared cameras by default? (#553)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] should enumerateDevices list infrared cameras by default? (#553)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] should enumerateDevices list infrared cameras by default? (#553)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Mark up IDL from constrainable patterns as non-normative
Thursday, 28 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [webrtc-insertable-streams] Add transform model (#51)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by henbos
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by henbos
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] applyConstraints algorithm is imprecise in how to select the actual settings values (#729)
- [webrtc-extensions] Adopt as working group draft (#67)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: UA s/SHOULD/MUST/ use one with the smallest fitness distance
Wednesday, 27 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Pull Request: Add TAG Security/Privacy questionnaire
- [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Pull Request: Security considerations -> Security and privacy considerations
- [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Pull Request: MediaStreamGeneratorSignal -> MediaStreamTrackSignal in IDL
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] MediaStreamGeneratorSignal -> MediaStreamTrackSignal (#11)
- [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Pull Request: MediaStreamGeneratorSignal -> MediaStreamTrackSignal
- [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Pull Request: Update index.html
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Fix incorrect reference (#9)
- [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Pull Request: Fix incorrect reference
Tuesday, 26 January 2021
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Investigate the possibility to interact with data channel in workers (#64)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] fractionLost missing from MTI stats list (#65)
- Re: [webrtc-insertable-streams] Add transform model (#51)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Fitness distance for bool placeholder & constraints not supported by device. (#766)
Monday, 25 January 2021
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] applyConstraints algorithm is imprecise in how to select the actual settings values (#729)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle changes to the set of tracks in a MediaStream assigned to an element via the srcObject attribute (#453)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Is getSettings returning rotated dimensions a footgun? (#761)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Investigate the possibility to interact with data channel in workers (#64)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263)
Sunday, 24 January 2021
Saturday, 23 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- [webrtc-extensions] fractionLost missing from MTI stats list (#65)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
Friday, 22 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Pull Request: Spec update
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Prepare final RFC references (#2621)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
Thursday, 21 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Investigate the possibility to interact with data channel in workers (#64)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Investigate the possibility to interact with data channel in workers (#64)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Investigate the possibility to interact with data channel in workers (#64)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Prepare final RFC references (#2621)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
- [webrtc-extensions] Investigate the possibility to interact with data channel in workers (#64)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Prepare final RFC references (#2621)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Prepare final RFC references (#2621)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Prepare final RFC references (#2621)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Prepare final RFC references (#2621)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Prepare final RFC references (#2621)
- Re: [webrtc-insertable-streams] Add transform model (#51)
- [webrtc-insertable-streams] Pull Request: Add transform model
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for unexposed constraints (#742)
Wednesday, 20 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Is packetsRecieved on the sender side using the correct method of estimation? (#592)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
Tuesday, 19 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capture-current-tab: Managing capture-ability by cross-origin embedder as opt-in vs. opt-out (#156)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Add ability to crop a MediaStream obtained through the share-this-tab API (#158)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capture-current-tab: Managing capture-ability by cross-origin embedder as opt-in vs. opt-out (#156)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-provisional-stats] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [mediacapture-automation] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-insertable-streams] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-ice] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-extensions] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-priority] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [mediacapture-record] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-identity] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [mediacapture-output] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correct packetsReceived sender-side algorithm to rely on RR. (#591)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Fix repo administrativia
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Mark track/ended as exported definition
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Enabling opus stereo audio without SDP munging (stereo=1) (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Enabling opus stereo audio without SDP munging (stereo=1) (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Update map to IETF drafts (#2594)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Stats to keep track of sync between audio and video (#158)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Enabling opus stereo audio without SDP munging (stereo=1) (#63)
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Memory management of a frame once enqueued (#5)
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Memory management for incoming frames (#6)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Enabling opus stereo audio without SDP munging (stereo=1) (#63)
- Re: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Is using ReadableStream/WritableStream the right approach? (#4)
- Closed: [mediacapture-insertable-streams] Is Phase 2 (ProcessingMediaStreamTrack) really needed? (#2)
Monday, 18 January 2021
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Stats to keep track of sync between audio and video (#158)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Enabling opus stereo audio without SDP munging (stereo=1) (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Prepare final RFC references (#2621)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Prepare final RFC references (#2621)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTCRtpSender.getCapabilities() may not return correct information in sync (#49)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Prepare final RFC references
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Stats to keep track of sync between audio and video (#158)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Stats to keep track of sync between audio and video (#158)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Stats to keep track of sync between audio and video (#158)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correct packetsReceived sender-side algorithm to rely on RR. (#591)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
Sunday, 17 January 2021
Friday, 15 January 2021
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correct packetsReceived sender-side algorithm to rely on RR. (#591)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] Clarify when the application can retry getUserMedia after it returns "InvalidStateError" due to the window not being in focus (#763)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify when the application can retry getUserMedia after it returns "InvalidStateError" due to the window not being in focus (#763)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Provide a little more transparency into the inner workings of getUserMedia (#764)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] Provide a little more transparency into the inner workings of getUserMedia (#764)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Provide a little more transparency into the inner workings of getUserMedia (#764)
Thursday, 14 January 2021
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Fitness distance for bool placeholder & constraints not supported by device. (#766)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for unexposed constraints (#742)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Unfit
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Header extension control: spec text inconsistent with RFC5285 section 6. (#60)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- [webrtc-extensions] new commits pushed by henbos
- Closed: [webrtc-extensions] Header extension control: spec text inconsistent with RFC5285 section 6. (#60)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify when the application can retry getUserMedia after it returns "InvalidStateError" due to the window not being in focus (#763)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify when the application can retry getUserMedia after it returns "InvalidStateError" due to the window not being in focus (#763)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by youennf
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Remove header extension control negotiation restriction. (#62)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] fractionLost missing from MTI stats list (#2620)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] fractionLost missing from MTI stats list (#2620)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- [webrtc-extensions] Question: Does the current SDP setup procedure allow a stereo audio session to be initiated without munging? (#63)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Add Youenn Fablet to the list of editors.
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Remove header extension control negotiation restriction. (#62)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] fractionLost missing from MTI stats list (#2620)
- [webrtc-extensions] Pull Request: Remove header extension control negotiation restriction.
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Header extension control: spec text inconsistent with RFC5285 section 6. (#60)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Header extension control: spec text inconsistent with RFC5285 section 6. (#60)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify when the application can retry getUserMedia after it returns "InvalidStateError" due to the window not being in focus (#763)
Wednesday, 13 January 2021
- [webrtc-stats] bytesReceived for local inbound could have a clearer definition (#593)
- [webrtc-stats] Is packetsRecieved on the sender side using the correct method of estimation? (#592)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify when the application can retry getUserMedia after it returns "InvalidStateError" due to the window not being in focus (#763)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Provide a little more transparency into the inner workings of getUserMedia (#764)
- [mediacapture-main] Provide a little more transparency into the inner workings of getUserMedia (#764)
- [mediacapture-main] Clarify when the application can retry getUserMedia after it returns "InvalidStateError" due to the window not being in focus (#763)
Tuesday, 12 January 2021
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correct packetsReceived sender-side algorithm to rely on RR. (#591)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] fractionLost missing from MTI stats list (#2620)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Correct packetsReceived sender-side algorithm to rely on RR.
Monday, 11 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-main] ResizeMode (crop-and-scale) is underspecified (#584)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] ResizeMode (crop-and-scale) is underspecified (#584)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Broken foreground detection (#752)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] applyConstraints algorithm is imprecise in how to select the actual settings values (#729)
Sunday, 10 January 2021
Saturday, 9 January 2021
Friday, 8 January 2021
Thursday, 7 January 2021
- [webrtc-extensions] new commits pushed by aboba
- [mediacapture-output] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add promised based getDecoderCapabilities and getEncoderCapabilities (#23)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add promised based getDecoderCapabilities and getEncoderCapabilities (#23)
- [webrtc-extensions] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- [webrtc-extensions] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- [webrtc-extensions] new commits pushed by aboba
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] A couple of minor Respec fixes (#56)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] A couple of minor Respec fixes (#56)
- [webrtc-extensions] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-extensions] Header extension control: Unknown exception type in spec text. (#59)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] s/IllegalArgument/InvalidModificationError/g (#61)
- [webrtc-extensions] Pull Request: s/IllegalArgument/InvalidModificationError/g
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Add Youenn Fablet to the list of editors. (#117)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] (jitterBufferDelay/jitterBufferEmittedCount * 1000) from pc.getStats is not equal to jitterBufferDelay/jitterBufferEmittedCount_in_ms in chrome://webrtc-internal (#590)
- [mediacapture-output] Pull Request: Add Youenn Fablet to the list of editors.
Wednesday, 6 January 2021
Tuesday, 5 January 2021
- Re: [mediacapture-main] resizeMode: "none" should imply native frame rates (#762)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Header extension control: Unknown exception type in spec text. (#59)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] resizeMode: "none" should imply native frame rates (#762)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] PING review (#116)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] (jitterBufferDelay/jitterBufferEmittedCount * 1000) from pc.getStats is not equal to jitterBufferDelay/jitterBufferEmittedCount_in_ms in chrome://webrtc-internal (#590)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] (jitterBufferDelay/jitterBufferEmittedCount * 1000) from pc.getStats is not equal to jitterBufferDelay/jitterBufferEmittedCount_in_ms in chrome://webrtc-internal (#590)
- [webrtc-stats] (jitterBufferDelay/jitterBufferEmittedCount * 1000) from pc.getStats is not equal to jitterBufferDelay/jitterBufferEmittedCount_in_ms in chrome://webrtc-internal (#590)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] PING review (#116)