- From: Mustaq Ahmed via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:33:42 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Let me clarify last few posts here, we are linking two different proposals here: - @karlt is correct about [JS API for querying User Activation](https://github.com/dtapuska/useractivation) which allows a frame to only "see" the user activation state of another frame. - The issue @annevk linked (whatwg/html#4364) was delegating user activation through `postMessage()` calls. This issue can be considered dead now---TAG expressed valid concerns around abusability. We are exploring an alternate proposal ([Capability Delegation](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx7qO7mFPhQwq0HkiL19d-rwKAEz3T3FnT9Gh6WRLmY/edit?usp=sharing)) which focuses on API-specific delegation without modifying user activation state in any frame. If media-capture finds this useful, please let us know. For the media-capture question raised in this issue, I think the answer depends on what `allow="display-capture"` really means. Does it expect the subframe to rely on its _own_ user activation for a media-capture call or no? An "yes" seems to be the safest answer to me because, for example, I don't ever want a random ad subframe in a site to perform screen-capture without a click in that frame. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mustaqahmed Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-screen-share/issues/167#issuecomment-821259898 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 16 April 2021 15:33:44 UTC