Wednesday, 30 September 2020
- [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Fix dictionary name and minus sign typos
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Closed: [mediacapture-output] Directing Web Speech API audio to a specific output device? (#102)
- [webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Update patent policy text
- [webrtc-insertable-streams] Consider using TransformStreams instead of exposing ReadableStream/WritableStream (#48)
- [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Note that required constraints are not allowed for device selection
- [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Remove a request permission to use algorithm note
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Reject with TypeError on required PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
- [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Fix nits in PTZ example
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Missing MediaTrack Settings (#208)
Tuesday, 29 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Reject with TypeError on required PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Make true a first-class value for pan, tilt and zoom constraints (#257)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by youennf
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Make true a first-class value for pan, tilt and zoom constraints (#257)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Identify the list of allowed required constraints for getUserMedia (#707)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Align with other specifications (non-normative changes)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Closed: [mediacapture-image] Document OverConstrainedError for PTZ in explainer (#229)
- [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Replace OverConstrainedError with TypeError (#264)
- [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Replace OverConstrainedError with TypeError
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263)
Monday, 28 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Sanitize PTZ capabilities/settings based on PTZ permission (#245)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Make true a first-class value for pan, tilt and zoom constraints (#257)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] applyConstraints algorithm is imprecise in how to select the actual settings values (#729)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] applyConstraints algorithm is imprecise in how to select the actual settings values (#729)
- [mediacapture-image] Does PTZ look good to you? (#263)
- [mediacapture-main] applyConstraints algorithm is imprecise in how to select the actual settings values (#729)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Update to latest ReSpec version (#728)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Update to latest ReSpec version (#2582)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
Sunday, 27 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Default device selection and listing inconsistencies (#727)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] default audio output should be first in the enumerateDevice returned list (#113)
- [mediacapture-main] Default device selection and listing inconsistencies (#727)
Saturday, 26 September 2020
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
Friday, 25 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246)
- Closed: [mediacapture-image] Stop referring to `advanced` constraints (#252)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Stop referring to `advanced` constraints (#252)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Allow PTZ support to be always exposed in capabilities (#260)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Closed: [webrtc-extensions] TAG review for playoutDelay (#51)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] TAG review for playoutDelay (#51)
- [webrtc-extensions] TAG review for playoutDelay (#51)
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
Thursday, 24 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Set up repo for auto-publication and automatic respec upgrade
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by henbos
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Should transceiver.stop() cause transciever.receiver.track.onended to fire? (#2581)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should transceiver.stop() cause transciever.receiver.track.onended to fire? (#2581)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Stopping senders and receivers: Present or absent? (#2579)
- Closed: [mediacapture-image] Sanitize PTZ capabilities/settings based on PTZ permission (#245)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Sanitize PTZ capabilities/settings based on PTZ permission (#245)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Publish automatically updates to the document as CR Drafts (#2580)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Publish automatically updates to the document as CR Drafts (#2580)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Make the set of transports for a PC obvious (#2563)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Sanitize PTZ capabilities/settings based on PTZ permission (#245)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL? (spec and implementation differ) (#2571)
- [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should transceiver.stop() cause transciever.receiver.track.onended to fire? (#2581)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Enforcing user gesture for getUserMedia in case of PTZ request (#254)
- [webrtc-pc] Should transceiver.stop() cause transciever.receiver.track.onended to fire? (#2581)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify pan/tilt/zoom settings (#245) (#249)
- [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
- [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
- [webrtc-priority] Wide review (#16)
- Re: [mst-content-hint] Wide review (#44)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
Wednesday, 23 September 2020
- [mediacapture-record] Use non-abbreviated terms in bitrates (#203)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints (#261)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Publish automatically updates to the document as CR Drafts
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Stopping senders and receivers: Present or absent? (#2579)
- [webrtc-insertable-streams] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
- [webrtc-pc] Stopping senders and receivers: Present or absent? (#2579)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
Tuesday, 22 September 2020
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Datachannel "transportId" doesn't say which transport (#575)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] RTCSctpTransport is missing transportId (#582)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- Re: [webrtc-stats] End-to-end delay metrics (#537)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Datachannel "transportId" doesn't say which transport (#575)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL? (spec and implementation differ) (#2571)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Should remote-inbound-rtp contain bytesReceived? (#584)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Define the set of transports for all connection state enums
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL? (spec and implementation differ) (#2571)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Point out that null mid+index only applies to end-of-candidates
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Should remote-inbound-rtp contain bytesReceived? (#584)
- [webrtc-priority] new commits pushed by caribouW3
- Closed: [webrtc-priority] Need to specify default priority and what to do about it (#12)
- Re: [webrtc-insertable-streams] Does transform receive Frames or Chunks? (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-insertable-streams] Does transform receive Frames or Chunks? (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
- Re: [webrtc-insertable-streams] Does transform receive Frames or Chunks? (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
- [webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Incorporate proposed editorial improvement from AC review
- [webrtc-insertable-streams] Does transform receive Frames or Chunks? (#47)
Monday, 21 September 2020
- [webrtc-priority] Pull Request: Default RTCDataChannelInit.priority to "low"
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Allow empty PTZ capabilities without PTZ permission (#259)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Allow empty PTZ capabilities without PTZ permission (#259)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Allow only ideal PTZ constraints in gUM (#258)
- [webrtc-pc] Unassociated, stopped transceivers after createOffer: Present or absent? (#2576)
- [webrtc-stats] Should remote-inbound-rtp contain bytesReceived? (#584)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Update to latest ReSpec version (#2575)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
Sunday, 20 September 2020
- Re: [webrtc-pc] addIceCandidate may not need to throw an error when no remoteDescription (#2519)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
Saturday, 19 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Simplify device selection algorithm (#725)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Simplify device selection algorithm (#725)
Friday, 18 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-output] default audio output should be first in the enumerateDevice returned list (#113)
- [mediacapture-output] default audio output should be first in the enumerateDevice returned list (#113)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Simplify device selection algorithm (#725)
- [mediacapture-main] Simplify device selection algorithm (#725)
- [mediacapture-output] Rename setSinkId to setAudioOutput (#112)
- [mediacapture-image] If PTZ permission is required, PTZ devices should be selected by getUserMedia (#262)
- Closed: [webrtc-priority] Move wpt tests to new directory (#8)
- Re: [webrtc-priority] Move wpt tests to new directory (#8)
Thursday, 17 September 2020
- [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Deny mandatory PTZ contraints in basic getUserMedia contraints
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Allow PTZ support to be always exposed in capabilities (#260)
- [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Allow PTZ support to be always exposed in capabilities
- Re: [webrtc-priority] Security and Privacy Questionnaire (#3)
- [webrtc-priority] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- Re: [webrtc-priority] Security and Privacy Questionnaire (#3)
- Closed: [webrtc-priority] Security and Privacy Questionnaire (#3)
- [webrtc-priority] new commits pushed by henbos
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Identify the list of allowed required constraints for getUserMedia (#707)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos
- [webrtc-priority] Pull Request: Security and Privacy section
- [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Allow empty PTZ capabilities without PTZ permission
- [webrtc-priority] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Allow only ideal PTZ constraints in gUM
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Clarify that remote-[in/out]bound-rtp.ssrc refers to the localId's ssrc (#454)
Wednesday, 16 September 2020
Tuesday, 15 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- [mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Make true a first-class value for pan, tilt and zoom constraints
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
Monday, 14 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720)
Sunday, 13 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Directing Web Speech API audio to a specific output device? (#102)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Directing Web Speech API audio to a specific output device? (#102)
Saturday, 12 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Directing Web Speech API audio to a specific output device? (#102)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Directing Web Speech API audio to a specific output device? (#102)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Add an algorithm to expose audio output devices through enumerateDevices (#109)
- [mediacapture-output] Rename selectAudioOutput: This specification does not define capture of headphones or speakers (#111)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Issue 38 - Cursor constraint (#58)
Friday, 11 September 2020
- [mst-content-hint] PING Review (#51)
- Closed: [mst-content-hint] Client/server-side question (#50)
- Re: [mst-content-hint] Client/server-side question (#50)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- [webrtc-pc] Can onicecandidate fire before SLD.then(code)? (#2574)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
Thursday, 10 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] editorial: fix indent of [Exposed=Window] (#2573)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] editorial: fix indent of [Exposed=Window] (#2573)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] editorial: fix indent of [Exposed=Window] (#2573)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] editorial: fix indent of [Exposed=Window] (#2573)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: editorial: fix indent of [Exposed=Window]
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Provide guidelines to persist capture transition indicators for long enough (#724)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Define the fitness distance for all required constrains. (#722)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- [mediacapture-main] Provide guidelines to persist capture transition indicators for long enough (#724)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- [mediacapture-main] Mandate implementations to support video frame subsampling (#723)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
Wednesday, 9 September 2020
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Define the fitness distance for all required constrains.
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721)
- Re: [mst-content-hint] Client/server-side question (#50)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm (#721)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
Tuesday, 8 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Pass camera and microphone lists to the exposure decision algorithm
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] End-to-end delay metrics (#537)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Update examples using modern JS. (#253)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Describe what we mean by ssrc for remote stats.
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Update examples using modern JS. (#253)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Flatten the stats hierarchy (#533)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Finding associated audio and video tracks? (#574)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Finding associated audio and video tracks? (#574)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Finding associated audio and video tracks? (#574)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Datachannel "transportId" doesn't say which transport (#575)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Datachannel "transportId" doesn't say which transport (#575)
- [webrtc-stats] RTCSctpTransport is missing transportId (#582)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] End-to-end delay metrics (#537)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] [Feature] registerStream(deviceId = '0', stream = MediaStream) (#712)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570)
Monday, 7 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720)
- [mediacapture-main] Clarify "audiooutput" does not mean capture of audio output to headphones or speakers (#720)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Define reception time for jitterBufferDelay stat (#549)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Add Henrik to the editor list (#579)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add Henrik B to the list of editors (#581)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Add Henrik B to the list of editors
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mst-content-hint] Why are arbitrary values disallowed for hints? (#47)
Saturday, 5 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] capture screenshot of DOM (#145)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Provide a means to select only part of a screen to capture (#105)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Broader API proposals for device selection and permissions (#719)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703)
Friday, 4 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Stop referring to `advanced` constraints (#252)
- [mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
- Closed: [mediacapture-image] Stop referring to `advanced` constraints (#252)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add Henrik to the editor list (#579)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] playout delay (#568)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Add appendix with flattened stats hierarchies? (#577)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Message text not localizable (#1605)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570)
Thursday, 3 September 2020
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Stop referring to `advanced` constraints (#252)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] MediaStreamTrack resizeMode constraint is too vague to request specific strategy (#702)
- [mediacapture-output] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
- [mediacapture-output] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Reference webidl properly to fix respec errors. (#110)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] MediaStreamTrack resizeMode constraint is too vague to request specific strategy (#702)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] MediaStreamTrack resizeMode constraint is too vague to request specific strategy (#702)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Creation of MediaStreamTrack from raw PCM stream; Example 18 with a JSON file instead of messaging (#2570)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Update Perfect Negotiation example to have the boolean (#2566)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix Perfect Negotiation
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Update Perfect Negotiation example to have the boolean (#2566)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL? (spec and implementation differ) (#2571)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
Wednesday, 2 September 2020
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL? (spec and implementation differ) (#2571)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Broader API proposals for device selection and permissions (#719)
- [mediacapture-main] Broader API proposals for device selection and permissions (#719)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Bug in spec: circular dependency for enumerateDevices() (#709)
- [mst-content-hint] Client/server-side question (#50)
Tuesday, 1 September 2020
- [webrtc-pc] Are sdpMid and candidate.sdpMLineIndex both allowed to be NULL (spec and implementation differ) (#2571)
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- [webrtc-insertable-streams] Pull Request: Fix a few editorial aspects
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Clarify meaning of PTZ constraints presence (#256)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Ignore PTZ request if no PTZ camera (#246)